"I was the head of the integrity committee in DK, which carried out a comprehensive security check of our candidates. Anyone who knows me knows that I am extremely strict in such matters," Ágnes Vadai began her post, then added: for days they have been defaming one of their candidates, Judit Ráczné Földi from Székesfehérvár, in front of the general public.
Gergely Karácsony previously stated that he would not vote for Csaba Tóth in Zugló, but would recommend supporting Ákos Hadházy. "The purification process that must go through in order for all our candidates to be able to say authentically about themselves, and we can also say about them: they are worthy of the trust of the majority who want change," the mayor wrote, and later added: Juditra Ráczné Földi's offshore case in Székesfehérvár would not vote because of
"Gergő, it's very strange to me that you don't even wait for the results of the investigation, but already demand the exclusion of the candidate. Well, this hardly fits with the concept of democracy that the opposition has represented so far
Ágnes Vadai responded to the mayor's words.
The DK representative asked Karácsony only one thing: if it is proven that Judith was falsely accused, then "you will apologize in the same public way as you did when you accused her and announced a 'verdict' even without an investigation".
He added:
You know, Gergő, the janitor's pace is not our bread and butter
"Perhaps you see that DK usually does not rush to the pre-election committee with reports, but if it has a problem, it tries to discuss it with the other party, the candidate," explained Ágnes Vadai.
The representative of the Democratic Coalition then asked tough questions about the campaign chief of the Christmas party: "Do you think it's okay that your party's candidate from Dunakes, Dávid Dorosz, previously received part of the money for reimbursement of his expenses as your deputy mayor, according to the data request on the atlatszó.hu internet portal, to Orbit chewing gum , did you spend it on pizza, muesli bars, cake and other delicacies? Do you think this is what reimbursement from public funds is for?
