There is no sinful people. Not "collectively", not at all. Why the victors of the Second World War put this stamp on the Germans is another question. After all, they clearly knew that no matter how big the Nazi party grew, its atrocities could not be extended to all Germans, especially that the majority of the population did not even sympathize with them.
The answer to the question is very simple. If a country is called guilty for decades, then sooner or later its citizens will identify with this judgment heard on the trail. And the "sinner" can be controlled. He can be left with prosperity, but he must be expected to quietly and silently comply with the orders of the current leaders and, above all, to never want to act as an independent nation again.
In our case: shut up in prosperity.
After such antecedents, Germany received another post-war command: behave in a politically correct manner! The inventors and promoters of "PC" knew exactly what they wanted. This tool is also suitable for inducing guilt and controlling the "sinners". Of course, not only in Germany.
Then came the wave of migrants, the Merkel lie of "Wir schaffen das" and the third guilt-generating order: don't be racist! Believe that immigrants are good for the country and (one day) you will be good with them too. Therefore, do not deal with the ever-increasing crimes they commit, stabbings, rapes, and the drugs they distribute. And don't even talk about them with your friends, and if you dare to do it in public, then you are guilty, a traitor to the future beautiful German future, and bear the fact that we will stigmatize you or fire you from your job in two minutes.
And in July 2020, the German government allocated more than 1 billion euros specifically for the "fight" against right-wing extremism and racism.
From a slice of this horrific amount, the left-wing German Integration and Migration Research Center (DeZIM Institute) wrote a study of more than 100 pages and created the "National Discrimination and Racism Monitor (NaDiRa)".
However, the study revealed that almost half of the respondents (44.8%) are clearly annoyed that they are called racist in their own country, and that accusations of racism and political correctness limit their freedom of expression.
Half of the respondents consider it "absurd" that historical figures such as Márton Luther or Kant are now being accused of racism.
According to six out of ten respondents (63.4%), it is absurd "that it is also racism if someone simply asks someone where they are from". (Presumably in relation to the migrants' country of origin - ed. ) More than two-thirds (72.4%) agree that a statement should not be immediately called racist without an underlying explanation.
But that's not all. On November 25, 2020, the "Cabinet Committee against Right-Wing Extremism and Racism" (!) was also established under the chairmanship of then-Chancellor Angela Merkel. It set the following goals:
- Raising awareness of racism as a phenomenon affecting society as a whole and creating better state structures in the field of combating right-wing extremism and racism. Strengthening cooperation between security authorities, the judiciary, state and civil society institutions.
- Preventing right-wing extremism and racism, anti-Semitism, anti-Muslim hostility and all other forms of group-related hostility in all areas of society, including online; the further development of political education and democracy work (…)."
Racism Monitor has recently identified "raceless racism", "cultural racism" and "neo-racism" as relatively new phenomena of particular concern. The latter refers to those German "racists" who dare to talk about the "incompatibility of independent cultures" and the resulting insurmountable difference between members of different "cultural groups".
According to the Wochenblick article, the 1 billion euros that can be spent until 2024 are primarily intended to provide endless, profitable work for "researchers", whom media scholar Norbert Bolz describes as "favorable scientists", as well as:
"There are also many representatives of sociology, political science, psychology and law who would like to act as key players in media debates. A real casting is taking place: those who say exactly what the editors expect on certain topics have the best chance of having their say. The fact that more and more such complacent scientists are appearing is now a very serious problem in the debates.”
AfD MEP Gunnar Beck warned against the German government's definition of racism as "anyone who believes that undocumented or non-European immigration should be restricted", even if such restrictions are "compatible with the Geneva Conventions". with the refugee convention".
"The fact that 75 percent of Germans want to restrict migration outside of Europe makes them as racist as '98 percent of Western and Eastern Europeans'"
said the politician.
Source: Wochenblick
Image: Freepik