Through sandblasted glass, we cannot see the activities behind it. We can encounter this phenomenon during the joint work of Átlátszónet Alapítvány and atlatszo.hu Közhasznú Nonprofit Kft. They claim to be an independent civil society organization, but they hang spectacularly on the umbilical cord of the Soros financial empire.

It cannot be questioned who is in charge of their investigative work.
The icing on the cake is their so-called KiMitTud channel, through which they encourage anonymous reports. Not sparing their curiosity, in 2021 they processed 2,727 data requests in one year, using the contact information of 5,372 data owners, disrupting their work. Their additional costs are high. Don't worry, because there are supporters for whom the majority will of the Hungarian people, honest, hard work does not matter if they want to assert their political and economic interests. "Atlátszók" had the opportunity to expand their organization from 7 to 12 people before the parliamentary elections, in addition to the fact that the salary costs of their managing owner increased almost threefold.
Their public utility is chiseled by calling their activities anti-corruption and, above all, smearing the legitimate government and Hungarian-owned enterprises. According to their own admission, they forward requested and coerced data to international and other organizations, which use them as attached goods for the benefit of their ideological goals. It should be underlined that according to our laws, foreign interests cannot directly request data of Hungarian public interest.

Their problem is solved by "Transparents".

Their donations collected through the company Benevity are anonymous, who knows where they come from. It is important to clarify what foreign sources provide the coverage. Do they have any intention of tax evasion or money laundering? The disclosure of the contract between "Transparents" and Benevity, which we have requested, cannot be avoided by referring to the fact that the donors are only private individuals with small amounts of money. We already know this version from the reference of the domestic dollar left. Not only civil supporters, but also offshore companies or even state institutions can hide behind the fundraising organization. That is why we are waiting for the contract from those at the forefront of data requests in the public interest, and if we do not receive it, we will use their "popular" approach and initiate a lawsuit. The start and end points of the transfers set in the financial report and the balance sheet can only prove the authenticity of the accounts.

For the time being, it seems that the "Transparents" use scented shower gel for washing, but it is also possible that the generous bathtub bath will not be enough for public opinion.

Source: Cöf-Cöka announcement

Featured image: Origo