According to a Slovak representative named Rastislav Šlosár, it is not right that Lajos Ódor can be the prime minister of Slovakia as a Hungarian national. Although the statement de jure does not exhaust the above concept, if it is uttered from the mouth of a mother-in-law, it should be a consequence.
The decision of the Swiss Supreme Court a few days ago did not receive as much press coverage as might have been expected. The news was reported (and welcomed) almost exclusively by the right-wing press. The elected judges of the Alpine country overruled a previous court ruling and issued the verdict that is natural for all normal people: Swiss people can only be men and women.
This did not turn the Earth off its axis of rotation, but we can acknowledge with some satisfaction that there is a European country, even outside of Hungary, where not everyone has gone crazy and, regardless of the terror of political taste, agrees with the evidence that
the survival of the human race is not guaranteed by operated on, drugged, brainwashed human corpses.
And behold a miracle: the entire mainstream press army was not silent, even the bloodiest mouthed pub announcers of the European Parliament kept quiet, or at least shamefully stomped around. The "progressives" who made it possible for the representatives to be scandalized by the exhibition of a "photographer" in the headquarters of the European Parliament last year, in which he depicted Jesus in the company of deviants, were also silent.
Of course, this is understandable, since Switzerland is not a member of the European Union. This will probably remain so for a while, thanks to a referendum, despite the fact that they tried in vain to force the Swiss to join the traveling cycle. Thus, even if the likes of Freund, Verhofstadt, Sophie in ´t Veld, Malin Björk and Roberta Metsola were to make indignant condemnation statements about the state of the Swiss legal system, the dog wouldn't care either.
But the Orbán-phobic free groups in Hungary also remained silent, because it would still have been embarrassing for them to point out that there are other peoples on the old continent who think the same way about the crown of creation as the recalcitrant Hungarians. And the prime minister of the Hungarians.
And then who could reconcile the insoluble contradiction between Christianity and materialism, while both theism and atheism claim the same thing about the human race? Which one should be proven right, preferably in such a way that the mentally ill who consider themselves "outside the gender" would have some kind of trump card in their hand?
According to Christian teaching, God created man as male and female, while thanks to the opposite pole, the biologist Darwin, we learn in elementary school that the survival and reproduction of developing, adaptable individuals is the alpha and omega of the origin and development of species. Which, of course, the "non-binary" LGBTQ herd of proteins, which exclude themselves from normality, cannot do. Human offspring can only be born from the union of a man and a woman. And according to the wisest peasant logic, every living person has/had a mother.
Without mothers and fathers, there would be neither deniers nor believers running on earth, nor, horribile dictu, those deviants who deny the two sexes.
But there is another aspect of this question, which is rarely discussed, that is, is stupidity a fundamental human right? Because today we are slowly getting to the point where all bullshit is considered a human right, while they are trying to deny people the most basic human rights. They complain about injustice where the law is respected, and try to make illegal border crossings, or more precisely, border violations, which are known to be illegal and punishable anywhere in the world, as legal.
Except for the head of water in Brussels who imagines himself to be the brains and morals of Europe. Where, in violation of the basic treaty of the EU and the Treaty of Lisbon, they had the ministers of the interior vote on a migrant quota (which, according to the new communists, does not exist), which only the Council should decide on.
Trampling law and justice in the mud like this no longer belongs to the category of stupidity and ignorance, but a crime, or at least a breach of contract.
Rowing into domestic waters: we, Hungarians from the highlands, are still confronted on a daily basis, for more than a century, with the dictate that it is mandatory to speak Slovak in Slovakia. In fact, you know. Which is incomprehensible from a legal point of view, since if someone does not want to or cannot learn a language, it is not punishable. On the other hand, the expression of representatives that exhausts the concept of incitement, incitement against national belonging, is punishable.
According to a Slovak representative named Rastislav Šlosár, it is not right that Lajos Ódor can be the prime minister of Slovakia as a Hungarian national. Although the statement de jure does not exhaust the above concept, if it is uttered from the mouth of a mother-in-law, it should be a consequence.
Of course, the question should be addressed to those who voluntarily go against the interests of their community (Béla Bugár, Ábel Ravasz, Konrád Rigó, Zsolt Simon, László Sólymos and their company), and who, in addition to trying to get paid for their representatives on the tailwaters of Slovak parties, they try to mislead the Hungarians in the highlands with texts. We didn't hear a peep from them after the outrageous statement, even though they constantly preach about social peace and common interests. Stupidity and slyness really cannot be punished, if only by the voters, who will hopefully reward the gentlemen accordingly.
Featured image: MTI/ EPA/Christian Bruna
