"We're going to tie them up and take them to the slaughterhouse," said the vice president of a California school district about college professors who oppose DEI, a higher education program that instills gender ideology. The teachers involved filed a lawsuit citing the US Constitution.

"They are also in the five percent that we still have to eliminate"

- this is how the Vice President of the Kern Community College District, which oversees public universities, John S. Corkins, spoke publicly at one of the board's meetings about university professors who oppose the introduction of the extreme DEI program in higher education, Fox News reported.

Orwell's "Animal Farm" , 2023

"They're in my stable," Corkins said of the university professors in the administrator's district who oppose the gender ideology program. "So we tie some of them up with a rope and take them to the slaughterhouse. This is human nature, I don't even know how to say it more clearly," he said.

His colleagues with a similar spirit, fueled by gender ideology, as the investigation of the university site Mindingthecampus.org found out, accepted the words of the agricultural graduate Corkins with approval:

“one trustee, Nan Gomez-Heitzeberg, chuckled heartily at the suggestion. Another smiled.”

DEI (diversity, equity, inclusion) is one of the cornerstones of gender indoctrination, in the spirit of which applicants are screened in many educational institutions in America, such as medical schools, and compulsory trainings are held with these three slogans.

In many universities, teaching staff strongly oppose or boycott the compulsory education of the ideologically overheated, unscientific DEI courses. (Well-known: until the very last year of the Soviet occupation, it was compulsory in all Hungarian higher education institutions for those participating in music or medical education to take part in pseudo-scientific, ideological training based on Marxist indoctrination, such as the compulsory course called Political Economy.)

A disgraceful teacher

the insulting and threatening tone of the statement, the institute for free speech filed a lawsuit against the district administrators. The plaintiff, Bakersfield College professor Daymon Johnson, said he became the target of an investigation after speaking openly about his political beliefs.

According to the lawsuit, the investigation began after the plaintiff, Johnson, responded to a post by fellow instructor Andrew Bond. In the Facebook post, Bond wrote about the United States and the American nation in a seriously insulting manner, calling the people living in the country s...ggheads.

The teacher's post insulting former US President Donald Trump openly provoked the Republicans.

Part of the story is that the university's teachers, who are extreme supporters of the Democratic Party and are fueled by the woke and gender ideology, and sometimes the students they provoked, accused the university's teachers of violence and racism on the social media site, and the teachers who do not identify with the spirit of the DEI and other programs.

In Johnson's response, he called Bond an "SJW" - a social justice warrior - a slang term used by the right to describe people on the far left. The conservative teacher advised his colleague to move to China and post the same thing about the Chinese Communist Party.

"There is reason to worry about his future"

According to the complaint, Johnson is under investigation as a result, and the instructor now fears he will be fired from the university. According to the lawsuit, the university recently fired professor Matthew Garrett, who

spoke openly against the school district's so-called anti-racist, i.e. woke-spirited, genderist, extremist initiatives.

"Plaintiff Daymon Johnson has particular reason to be concerned about his future as a professor at Bakersfield College if he continues to express his views," the suit states. "Bakersfield College has already subjected Professor Johnson to a lengthy and intrusive investigation simply because he criticized and challenged the views of a colleague."

But "the First Amendment prohibits the state from forcing its citizens to join or support any official ideology," the lawsuit states.

Without evidence

Vice President Corkins later apologized for his comments about slaughterhouses in a public meeting. He added: "My intention was to emphasize that the people speaking in the public comment section of the meeting have my full support."

The administrator with a degree in agriculture who wanted to slaughter university professors was therefore "just" believing

in addition to gender ideology.

"Let's sum up the situation," writes one university forum  , "students and a teacher get a forum and an interface. Here, without a shred of evidence, they can falsely accuse the faculty of violence and racism. And the member of the university board of trustees accepts and even encourages this bickering, and then actually

threatens to kill teachers and staff."

Source: hirado.hu

Cover image: Illustration / Photo: Adobe Stock / foxnews.com