Our age is characterized by the impossible situation that it is easier for soldiers to die on the front than to survive the peace after the fighting is over. At least these consistent opinions and concrete experiences of the XX. and XXI. seeing veterans of 19th century modern wars. They are those certain "Rambos".
What makes the lessons of modern wars different when perceiving the fate of veterans who become human wrecks? The most important difference is that noble goals and ideals that despise death have disappeared or are disappearing from our proud civilization, because today's bloodshed is only about money, the profit-increasing game of a narrow economic group.
We are victims of a war game - together with the soldiers - where the crackling of weapons often begins without a transition, and then suddenly ends after senseless destruction and bloodshed. While everything remains mostly the way it was before the fights, it's just gotten a lot worse for everyone except the perverted instigators.
In addition to families who lost relatives in the war, demobilized veterans are the most vulnerable. They, who saw the destructive power of modern weapons, experienced the fate of their comrades and miraculously survived. The weapons manufactured today were invented for the complete and perfect destruction of the enemy. Life is completely defenseless against the firepower of successful technical miracles and their digitized brains. Even a significant number of pilots were once able to survive the loss of their plane. Against the robots of our modern world, technology can remain unscathed, but living power cannot. Because man has become the real target. Anyone who has been in a modern war knows exactly what the sentences described above mean.
The planners of destructive conflicts - because the beginning of war never dates back to the clash of soldiers and weapons - do not deal with the development of human destinies at all. Just as they are not interested in the opinion of their subjects about whether or not there should be a war.
In such an environment, why would the German government's statement that a war between NATO and Russia start in 2025 be surprising? Even the territory was demarcated: between Belarus and Kaliningrad, marking the so-called Suwalki Corridor. In order to do this, they say, NATO is grouping three hundred thousand soldiers in the easternmost wing of Europe, in which Germany will be present with thirty thousand soldiers.
If the self-proclaimed politicians, of course mistakenly, are actually playing war at the expense of the people, it is worthwhile to analyze the German military policy narrative a little, as a not insignificant detail once again escaped the attention of the German government members. It just so happens that NATO is not equal to Germany. In other words, the way the German leadership is trying to force its legitimately dissatisfied people, who have been protesting for days, back into their homes by intimidation, is not compatible with NATO. At this time, NATO is a military defense alliance of 31 countries, which means that a clash between Russia and NATO is possible if the Kremlin's leadership launches an attack from, say, the direction of the Suwalki Corridor. If such information has specifically arisen about Russian preparations, it must be published item by item with the facts to the authorities of the NATO member states. That is, to us, the public. If there is no question of such a thing, which the Russian leadership has repeatedly declared, NATO cannot, due to its constitution, act offensively or provoke a clash.
Then what is the background of the German statement? Not reality at all. In history, there has already been a resounding statement from the German side, which talked about the occupation of the East and its settlement with "Aryans", but only after the German economy prospered in 1939 and the military was ready to start the Second World War. We could cynically say that
fortunately, nowadays German industry and society are ready for many things, but least of all a war of conquest. Thanks to the German political elite, Germany is experiencing a crisis that was not justified by objective circumstances. The fact that it turned out this way, and that more and more people are taking to the streets to protest, is precisely because their stupid, criminal government "liberated" the German economy from cheap Russian energy.
In addition, the reserves accumulated in previous years were spent by these gentlemen and ladies on migrants and Ukraine. Today, the coffers in the German budget are empty, just as the barracks are empty in terms of combat equipment. The set of objective conditions necessary for war has been so amortized that anyone who wants to take his nation into battle with such a background cannot be counted...
Or they know very well what their task is, which they received from the background forces that incited the migration invasion.
It seems that they want to speed up the destruction of the standards of human life for the sake of the vision of a demented technocratic world, which was also discussed in Davos. According to them, the most suitable solution for this is an extended war in Europe. For example, there, on the land of Eastern Europe. The short-term consequence of which would mean the immediate destruction of the Baltics, Poland, and Finland, and the second-stage destruction of the other Eastern European countries, including Hungary.
Only then would Germany become the object of the war. The United States, as well as the declared enemy Russia, would remain viable, since it has become a historical fact that the Ukrainians were not able to suppress the Russian bear even with NATO weapons. What's more, they were once again steered into a position of great power by provoking an armed conflict that was completely devoid of normalcy.
The destruction and its sequence as indicated above is not fiction, but a very factual picture of the situation and, of course, a consequence in the event of a possible European war. They know this in Berlin too. What are they dreaming about, threatening, and why are they terrorizing the population?
Perhaps it would be more moral and patriotic to deal with the causes of discontent in German society and eliminate them.
This attitude would make Germany - and of course Europe - not a war battlefield, but a prosperous country and continent once again due to economic cooperation.
The author is a secret service expert and chairman of the board of trustees of the Protected Society Foundation
Source: Hungarian Nation
Cover image: Illustration / German soldiers board an Airbus A400M transport plane to evacuate German citizens from Sudan at al-Azrak air base in Jordan on April 23, 2023.
MTI/EPA/Bundeswehr