If it does not change, this European Union must be abolished. I repeat, emphatically: this union must be terminated if nothing changes after June 9 or if it deteriorates even further.
Let me preface it: I would like to at least make the alleged and exclusively human cause of global warming a subject of discussion. But before that, about agriculture.
The European Commission, as well as the member states that slavishly follow them - such as Germany - are taking measures one after the other, which simply cannot have any other end result than making traditional farming and animal husbandry impossible for thousands of years, which "merely" threatens only with the danger that that which has provided us with our "daily bread", our food until now, is over, it is going to ruin, the farmers are unable to cope, and as a result we simply starve to death.
Behind all this is the green ideology, the green agreement of the European Union, the Green Deal.
First: forcing farmers not to cultivate land in certain areas, to make them barren, to end their activities for the sake of climate protection. Farmers in the Netherlands were forced to do this a few months ago, the measures put more than ten thousand farmers in an impossible situation. On the other hand, it should be pointed out here that some members of the global elite, such as Bill Gates, are buying huge agricultural lands for themselves. I wonder why? Isn't it because he knows that once the food supply is cut off, he'll still have plenty of territory to avoid unpleasant consequences?
Second, they introduce tax-related measures that affect farmers. This includes, for example, the abolition of tax incentives for diesel-powered agricultural machines in the Germans, French and other countries, the raising of other taxes, the tightening of animal husbandry, etc., as a result of which farmers find themselves in an almost impossible situation.
Thirdly, there are price increases, whether in the case of fertilizers or plant protection agents, not to mention the general increase in energy prices and the withdrawal of subsidies.
Fourth, Brussels is getting closer and closer to allowing non-GMO-free products into Europe, yielding to the demands of the American state and giant companies, at most on the condition that the GMO content of these products must always be indicated. But, as usual, after a while they will introduce simplifications here too, or rename GMO products to, say, product number 2, just as in some countries parents are no longer fathers and mothers, but 1 and 2 number of parents, regardless of their gender. Brussels' imagination is simply limitless when it comes to taking and gradually accepting measures that help ruin the lives of European people.
Fifth, the release of Ukrainian agricultural products onto the European market is a concrete, tangible crime of Brussels, which represents a direct and clear, present danger for European, especially Eastern and Central European farmers. It is a well-known fact that the regulations related to Ukrainian agricultural products are much looser than those within the EU, the quality of Ukrainian products, from grain to food, is much lower than that of Europeans, but that is why the Europeans simply cannot compete with the prices of Ukrainian products. And in spite of the protests, the European Commission was able to withdraw its measure on the ban on the import of Ukrainian products, which had been in place for several months, and until next May, Ukrainian goods can once again flow freely into the EU, instead of going to their original destination, Africa and the Middle East. - They would get to the east.
It is therefore clear that every step taken by Brussels and the European leaders who serve the globalist elite in Brussels is deliberately destroying European agriculture. This, if we are not talking about idiots and mental patients - sometimes this is not excluded, of course - is a clear betrayal of European interests.
Normal leaders could not do this, and would not do it.
Behind this, as in general behind left-liberal and globalist aspirations, there is once again a world-changing ideology since the French Revolution and the rise of Freemasonry. They believe in this, and this is now shown in the fact that global warming is intensifying in a destructive way, the earth's climate is becoming unbearable, but we know from them that there is only one reason for this: human carbon emissions, mainly and mainly anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions.
But are we sure that we know that this is the cause of the warming, which, moreover, we cannot say with certainty that it causes enormous damage to life on earth? While we really know for sure that in the history of our planet there have been higher average temperatures than this, and these were definitely fertile periods for humanity.
So let's stop here and get to the point! And this is that the deliberate destruction of agriculture - the basis of our existence for thousands of years - is not the work of chance, but the result of a total ideology.
The green ideology is exactly like the communist, the Nazi, or the current extreme liberal ideology: it wants to bring paradise to Earth, namely by simply eliminating human carbon emissions according to the plans by 2050, but 2035 is already an important date in this in a frenzy. And he is convinced that if we only eat insects and worms, that will be the earthly Canaan itself.
There is only one problem: the starting point of the big boys is simply either debatable and unproven, or even worse: false and wrong. They have to go to the roots, namely the leaders of the EU member states, instead of fearlessly following the self-destructive, suicidal plans of Brussels and - what's worse! – specific measures.
It is not necessary to extract concessions, but to talk about the essence: what is true in the so-called "scientific" explanations behind the steps taken in Brussels?
Because if it turns out that climate ideology and hysteria are simply not true, that global warming is caused by human carbon dioxide emissions, then what the hell is going on? And what kind of cowardice is it that the states are not able to go against this, if the doubt is strong?
Of course, many state leaders say to this: well, once there is a scientific consensus regarding a person's criminal activities, then what can be done? What will happen to me then, to me, the minister and the prime minister, if I were to ask about it once, it really is so certain that global warming can be done by humans, and not by the activity of the sun, the ever-changing orbit of the earth, certain cosmic processes, for which there is no, but no we have no influence on it and can't? Could it be that the clouds covering our planet limit the greenhouse effect in the first place? Couldn't it be that water vapor also plays a role in the processes, and can't everything be attributed to humans, or to the "very brutal" amount of carbon dioxide present in the atmosphere, around 0.004 percent? Can't you ask about all of this?
What does the global elite base their climate ideology and their actions on? Of course, to the work of the IPCC, i.e. the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, operating under the auspices of the UN, which has issued several reports since 1990, and these are like some kind of divine revelation: everyone must believe in them.
Although it doesn't hurt to know that the international scientific counter-association called Clintel (Climate Intelligence) already has almost two thousand members, renowned scientists and researchers, including our academician Csaba László Szarka, and they cast deep doubt on the IPCC's claims. The number of members of the two bodies is almost the same. Why should we, the uninitiated, believe that the IPCC can only be right based on a globalist announcement? Let's stop this bullshit!
Instead, let's start an international, fair debate in which there are no more equals, only truly equals. Science is just like that, or should be like that. And until the scientific debate has been decided in some direction, the Union and the West should not take any measures against agriculture, against people! If only because forty-six scientists left the IPCC in the meantime and now go against the "articles of faith" there.
But it cannot be that instead of a public scientific debate, there is an IPCC ideology designated as canon, under the influence of which the Davos elite, the UN, the European Union, the Biden government act and destroy the world.
This is what outrages me, and this is why I demand from the political decision-makers, heads of government and ministers not to give in to the violence of the mainstream, to listen to their common sense, because the fate of humanity is in their hands. Their responsibility is huge!
Source: Hungarian Nation
Photo: Tamás Fricz Facebook
