A Guinness record, there can be no doubt about that. Or it would be if our beloved opposition could decide on this. According to them, during the past 14 years, not a single action, decision, or movement of the government was correct. Good thing they only think so.

We know the opposition tropes: the government steals, cheats, lies, impoverishes the citizens, doesn't do anything and does it badly, stuffs its friends with money, is completely isolated, and of course it has already failed at least three times a day, but they don't know about it yet. Ferenc Jóska's saying is repeated, only twisted: everything is very ugly, everything is very bad, we are not satisfied with anything.

Because, according to them, the truth is over there, on their side. Of course, this view is not shared by our brainwashed voting base, which is why the very wonderful enemy is unable to win an election in this dark dictatorship. It is the dictatorship of the majority over the minority - although elsewhere it is called democracy. However, different winds blow here, so this is a dictatorship, even if it is also a democracy, period!

Just as it is indisputable (?) that evil is a white, Christian, heterosexual creation - how disgusting that they are men and women! - they steal everything, from which it directly follows that the European Union would have the duty to directly finance the very powerful opposition-led municipalities instead of the government, because only they conduct responsible management. Come see Budapest! There, they really spend on what they need. For Geri-stakes, imaginative painting of yellow stripes, forty-some consultants, buying rainbow flags, and we could go on and on. How cute isn't it?

They think carefully about what they will spend from the more than 200 billion they inherited from the Tarlóses - well, it is no longer there, it has turned into smoke, leaked out, floated away in the ether as if by magic. It could only have happened this way, otherwise we would know what it was spent on. Let's say we know a tiny bit, the renovation of the Chain Bridge took an extra 5 billion, thanks to the preparation carried out with great expertise and because some people probably got a little bit of it.

Anyway, it is obvious that if the money came directly to them, it would be a blessing and a truth.

Now the question is, who pays for the ferry? The correct answer from the Ballibs side: the ferryman himself. Because who pays the guild and possible fines if they don't treat the sushka received from the Union properly? So who? Of course, the government, but because it is government money, it does not exist, all taxpayers pay.

Let's say, but only in theory, that metro number 4 is being built (like Luca's chair, i.e. at a snail's pace, but it's still being built) and let's say that, wonder of wonders, 167 billion just disappears from this framework. And let's assume, but only theoretically, that the European Commission imposes a penalty of HUF 76.6 billion on us due to irregularities discovered by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF). Do you think that the capital would pay for this? One thing, the budget, i.e. you and me and everyone.

Let's say, but only theoretically, that there is a politician who is a fearless amazon of the fight against corruption and fraud, who accuses this corrupt government in the European Parliament every day in his hysterical speeches. But let's say that in the meantime, with the collusion of companies that are part of his family's interests, he cheats a healthy person and tries to steal the EU support he received. Also, we say that it doesn't work out for them, the ugliness is revealed, and in the end, the unlawfully deducted amount plus the penalty must be paid back. Who pays? Your companies? One thing, the budget, i.e. you and me and everyone.

And now we say that it will be achieved at the Union so that not the government, but directly the very reliable and demonstrably competent local governments in light of the above receive funds. But what if a stick slips in here and there? If they accidentally withdraw certain funds, if they overbill and fail with it? Who pays back and who bears the penalty? At municipality? One thing, the budget, i.e. you and me and everyone.

Again, a nice sounding absurd idea. Of course, there's no doubt that it would be nice to beat someone else with that particular nettle, but thanks, I wouldn't want to beat yours, mine, or everyone else's. I really want to!

Let's agree on something, opposition comrades and comrades. Everything is better as it is. I know, it's a very dictatorial solution that whoever receives the money is also responsible for spending it, but for kibics it's candy.

Am I understood?

Cover photo: Anna Donáth Facebook