The American empire is a degenerative entity that threatens the destruction of America as a nation-state. Written by László Bogár.
It turned out to be a bit long, but the speech was even more moving by the son of Robert Kennedy, who would have run as an independent candidate in the presidential election, but announced his withdrawal and that he supports the presidency of Donald Trump. In the speech, he confronted the Democratic Party that raised his father and uncle to the highest levels, calling it the party of censorship, corruption and war.
It is a dramatic development that his entire extended family, the Kennedy clan, immediately turned against him and declared him a traitor, even though with this speech, the younger Kennedy consistently assumed the spiritual and moral legacy of his father and uncle.
Perhaps no one has ever stated more clearly that the American empire is a degenerative entity that threatens America as a nation-state with destruction. That the power economic structures of the empire, Big Tech and Big Pharma, the military-war industrial complex, and the Deep State, which embodies the empire, serve within the administration to expropriate the American nation-state. And whoever serves this as a politician, as the Democrats do now, goes against the basic aspirations of his own people.
Robert Kennedy Jr. made a strategic alliance with Donald Trump, who considers it an honor.
If he has a sense of humor, and there are many signs that he does, then as president he will appoint Kennedy Jr. as FBI director, because it is evident to everyone that the FBI and its leader, Edgar Hoover, were presumably involved in the empire's "execution" of JFK and Robert Kennedy. had a decisive role. This strategic agreement may turn out to be one of the most important milestones in the history of the United States of America.
So far, it has been evident that although there is a constant battle between the two parties (Democrats and Republicans), both are willing servants of the American world empire.
With this agreement, however, the image of an alliance openly opposing the empire emerges, which would still be very difficult to define today, and it is crucial for both parties how they understand the essence of their strategy with the largely unsuspecting American society.
The very first task would be for the majority of voters to finally understand that the nation-state and the empire are not only not the same, but that the empire itself is the ever-increasing threat to the nation-state. This will be a very difficult task, because during the childish formulation of the self-identity of the American people, they assume an identity almost entirely with the empire, they are proud of the empire's global military and financial dominance, which, just like the entire world, robs them of themselves. And this is still the smallest part of the task, even though it seems insurmountable for now.
Even more difficult and delicate is the task of making people aware that a significant part of their income and wealth comes from this imperial plunder.
In other words, if the American electorate somehow understood that he had to dismantle the degenerate ruling structures of the world empire from his side, if he did not want to die under the ruins of the collapsing empire, he would hardly accept with enthusiasm that as a result his income and wealth will be significantly reduced. However, these two dramatic realizations built on each other and the making of inevitable sacrifices in the wake of these realizations in the American society, which is already fragmented along the fault lines of the Civil War, promises an unimaginably difficult and risky governance for Donald Trump and the Democrats who are now preparing to form an alliance with him. (Besides the young Robert Kennedy, Tulsi Gabbard is the other democrat, she was a presidential aspirant in the Democratic Party in 2020, who has now also sided with Donald Trump, turning against his party, which is classified as a global collaborator and corrupt.)
And this is still the "lesser half" of the strategic task, because the future of the global power system, i.e. the American world empire which forms the basis of this power system, the whole of the world war it instigated and the main "frontal zones" must also be declared.
Although Donald Trump promised to end the killing on the Ukrainian front of the World War in a single day, just as he promises easy and quick changes in the conflict zone of the Middle East, which raises at least such dangerous and even more delicate questions, but the power structure of these conflicts seems to refute this .
And last but not least, his strategy regarding China, which is assumed to be a world imperial rival, also assumes fast and decisive actions, at least at the rhetorical level.
Because it sounds very energetic that he will stop China's "commercial aggression" with huge tariff increases and "bring home" the outsourced industry, but there are some very sensitive questions here as well. The high tariffs must be paid by the American consumer, and patriotic enthusiasm alone is necessary, but not sufficient for the solution. Just as "bringing" the industry home does not appear to be an easy task either.
And since everything depends on the narrative, that is, on the ability to talk about the challenges listed here for the American society, the very first, or rather "zero" level, is the formulation of the unfolding strategy. Getting the majority of American society to understand and if possible support all of this.
During the two months ahead, it will be decided whether such a method of narration exists at all.
