Péter Magyar - from under Weber's arm - says: our independence is not small, but our face is big. Written by Tamás Pilhál.
I have to embitter those sectarians who think that their hoped-for savior, Péter Magyar, is some kind of flamboyant mind, just a genius of the era. No, it isn't. He's a stupid, hyperaggressive little boy, nothing more. From whom his game was taken away (his monthly state "free lunch") of three million, and therefore he started an indecent tantrum. But if he had an ounce of sense, he wouldn't be harming such things while he was trampling:
So, a very small amount of sovereignty would have to be renounced in order for the Hungarian people to receive these EU funds.
Nor these:
Indeed, for a small part, national sovereignty must be renounced by the member state that [...] wants to join [...] the European Public Prosecutor's Office. But we gave up a much larger part of this sovereignty when we joined the European Union or when we entered the Schengen zone, and in fact we still give up a small part of sovereignty with a lot of legislation.
Above a certain level of intelligence and insight, Hungarian politicians do not argue about how they would curtail the self-determination of Hungarians. Not a little, not a lot. You should know
it is a historical experience that Hungarians cannot suffer when they fiddle with their independence. On the other hand, Péter Magyar with great self-awareness started sawing the branch under him, on which the protective uncle and aunt, Manfred (Kígyó) Weber and Ursula via SMS, planted him.
(And now here we are deliberately examining the question only on the intellectual axis, neglecting the moral one. How could we analyze the moral motivations of someone who eavesdropped, blackmailed, ruined his own wife, kept his family in terror with a knife, feigned suicide?)
The Gyurcsánys and the entire Hungarian left want and even demand that we join the European Public Prosecutor's Office. How about! For years. After all, this is what is written in the imperial line leader, in black and white. And what Brussels-Washington prescribes is scripture. Otherwise, no more dollars. But Gyurcsány and the Hungarian left had so much to eat up until now that they framed the liquidation of the independent Hungarian prosecutor's office and the sprinkling of salt in its place not as a "small" but essential curtailment of Hungarian sovereignty. Rather, as an arrival in the Western Canaan flowing with milk and honey, as a mastery of eating with a knife and fork, as a welcome to European prosperity, and as sending Fidesz and its entire moon court to duty. (See also: "Felcsud lawsuit".)
In cards, you do not reveal your strongest trump cards at the beginning of the game. You don't tell your opponent your war plan in chess either. Especially if that war plan is nothing more than an extremely vile treason.
Anyone who would place the remnants of the independent Hungarian legal system in the hands of a foreign – and apparently increasingly hostile, losing and therefore lost – empire is a common traitor. And exactly.
The communists didn't say that the Soviet soldiers were on our necks to take away our independence and trample on our sovereignty. But that they protect the peace and safety of the Hungarian working people, moreover, out of pure good intentions. The Komcs had enough sense not to tie it to the noses of the Hungarians for their own well-conceived interests: the Soviet bayonets are needed so that they can stay in power in the country of "nine million fascists". Whether the majority saw through the sieve is another matter.
It seems that Péter Magyar doesn't have as much to bake as his grandfather and his comrades had. On the one hand, this is unfortunate - at least from the point of view of the believers who put their trust in him. On the other hand - from the country's point of view - it is welcome. In that sense, we owe a debt of gratitude to this little boy hungry for revenge. His owners had barely removed the muzzle from him, and he had already de-conspired. "A very small amount of sovereignty should be given up." Which I think can be easily interpreted as:
if the imperial kindergarten uncles and aunts (who planted Péterke on the tree branch and in the bean soup) graciously allow it, maybe we can have a little piece of sovereignty left, and finally, maybe we can get the money we are entitled to according to the law, if we raise their supporter to power in '26. Otherwise, what has happened so far will continue: extortion, threats, proceedings for breach of obligations, more Sargentini slanders, Erasmus sucking, all the money due to us due to non-acceptance of illegal migrants being stolen and shoveled to Kiev.
And so on.
I am convinced that Péter Magyar should be allowed to speak in the same way as Péter Márki-Zay. Both Peters have a special ability for overt political harakiri. At least they don't explain what they would do with this "bloody country" at the closed faction meeting in Ószöd, but live, directly, proudly. And why bother them with that? Old wisdom: never interrupt the enemy when he is about to make a mistake. Márki-Zay came up with the idea of sending Hungarian soldiers to Ukraine, and the belt buckle from under Manfred Weber's arm says something like: our sovereignty is not small, but our face is too big.
Yesterday, in an internet post, he tried to explain why he is still right:
The transparent fear of sovereignty from the Orbáns is especially funny in light of the fact that the basic law they wrote states that Hungary itself renounced a part of its sovereignty by joining the union.
To which we could even briefly answer: "particularly funny" is the Orbán and Fidesz phobia of a figure who, until February of this year, stood up and applauded the system of national cooperation at a small number of government events, and then - after his honor was exhausted and the state's sarcasm died down - he suddenly realized how much he hated his previous breadwinners. This - as a red tail - could be attached to every single article dealing with the brains of Péter Magyar.
For our own sake, let's take the above sentence to taste. According to our Basic Law, we did not give up our self-determination by joining the EU, we only exercise certain pre-defined powers together with the other member countries, through the EU institutions.
In order to participate in the European Union as a member state, Hungary may, on the basis of an international treaty, exercise certain powers arising from the Basic Law jointly with the other member states, through the institutions of the European Union, to the extent necessary for the exercise of the rights arising from the founding treaties and the fulfillment of obligations.
At the same time, it is like this
exercise of powers must be consistent with the basic rights and freedoms contained in the Basic Law, and may not limit Hungary's inalienable right to dispose of its territorial unit, population, form of government and state organization
- can be read in the basic law of our country. In other words: ex-Vargáné is mistaken. In a better case.
The worst (and I think more likely) case is that Péter Magyar is not wrong, he just says what he is told. As a puppet of Manfred Weber, he brushes off the fact that we have already given up a part of our sovereignty anyway, even a little bit of giving up doesn't matter.
Through Péter's mouthpiece, the empire is sending a message: they have no idea of fiddling with the "joint exercise of powers" contained in the accession treaty. They need our sovereignty, shit. Even though we didn't sign anything like that, they squeeze us until they squeeze the shit out of us.
It is a wonderful picture of our Péter sitting next to Weber (on the donkey bench) in the European Parliament. As Manfred and Ursula smiled warmly at him as they shook his hand. "Péter Magyar is the future," Manfred Weber then told all of us. He intended it as a letter of recommendation. Snakes snake.
Featured image: Ripost
