Because we know, don't you know, if there's a cap, that's a problem, if there's no cap, that's a problem. This game is cultivated at the teacher level by the Democratic Trade Union of Teachers.

To be honest, the name "democratic" in the name of an organization is immediately suspicious these days. Because that's what the Gyurcsány party calls itself , isn't it? Democracy is mentioned by pseudo-civilian organizations that attack the government and usually speak of a "democratic opposition". And this means dictatorship in new parlance, which several of their leaders and their "thinkers" who belong to the slep made it quite clear to us.

They democratically want to "pause" democracy in the event of their eventual election victory (only until they deal with those who do not join those who insult the current government), they would make those who oppose them in the "culture war" run to the ground , very democratically they want to silence the part of the journalists who do not support them , not to mention the pitchfork, IFA platform, lamp iron, they also like to mention these as the main pillars of their democracy.

We have clearly seen that the PDSZ (Democratic Union of Teachers) is not a great friend of the government. There wasn't and isn't a decision about which they didn't have at least one bad word (but rather more), but their soul is on it, in a democracy (the real one) they have the right to it. However, to put it mildly , it is strange if their own, fulfilled demand does not win their approval either.

While they demanded the closure of schools and the transition to digital education when it happened, they fell for the decision almost immediately because, according to them, the transition was not prepared. (This may even be true, since due to the epidemic there was hardly any time left for proper preparation.) Then they fought for the vaccination of the teachers (it was not known who against, but they fought), and now, when the government provides vaccination out of sequence, to incite they are trying against reopening.

Gergely Gulyás, the minister in charge of the Prime Minister's Office, is apparently tired of the "if there is a cap...if there is no cap" game and reacted to the work of the PDSZ in a Facebook post:

"About the Democratic Union of Teachers, or why it is harmful if an interest group imagines itself as an opposition party.

At the end of February, the Democratic Union of Teachers asked the Prime Minister in a letter to close schools and order digital work in all public education institutions and in the field of vocational training. The government made a corresponding decision within a week.

According to the PDSZ's position recorded in the letter at the time: "if after the closure, the workers in the sector are vaccinated; and armed with strict epidemiologic protocols, we reopen the institutions, then not only elementary, but also high school students would be able to return to the pews."

At Wednesday's meeting, the Government decided to vaccinate teachers out of sequence. Teachers who have already registered can receive the vaccination between April 1 and 3, and those who register later between April 8 and 10. After that, schools will open on April 19.

We could rightly think that the PDSZ is satisfied. If not the government, at least they praise themselves: their demands have been met.

There are many people who, like teachers, meet many people every day due to their work and do not get vaccinated outside of the queue. Education and upbringing of future generations is undoubtedly one of the most responsible tasks. That is why the PDSZ's request and the government's decision were justified.

Even after fulfilling the union's request, he continues to criticize the government and try, unsuccessfully, to turn the teachers against the opening of the schools due in more than three weeks. This is clear proof that the PDSZ is secondary to both school education and the teachers they represent. The priority is seeking conflict with the government. Even during the most difficult period of the epidemic.

This is both irresponsible and unfortunate.”