The age in which we live is the age of the complete collapse of social reality, or more precisely, the age of a conscious and deliberate decision to destroy it. Any false artificial reality can be built and made dominant if there is a media weapon of sufficient energy. The strategic goal of this all-consuming global war is the traditional self-identity that still exists, and thus the elimination of reality. PrésHáz.eu interview with László Bogár.
Honor your father and your mother so that you may live long in the land that the Lord your God is giving you," reads Moses II. in verse 20.12 of his book on the pages of the Vizsoli Bible. Professor, gender extremism wants to ban the words father and mother because they are discriminatory. This directly attacks the Ten Commandments, indirectly Moses, the great Jewish leader. Can we record the fact of anti-Semitism?
The age in which we live is the age of the complete collapse of social reality, or more precisely, the age of a conscious and deliberate decision to destroy it. Any false artificial reality can be built and made dominant if there is a media weapon of sufficient energy. The strategic goal of this all-consuming global war is the traditional self-identity that still exists, and thus the elimination of reality. Only now does the line in the text of the International that "completely erase the past" really make sense, now the final liquidation of the past, tradition, and history is taking place. The goal is, by definition, to create a global arrangement of complete rootlessness and, as a result, total control and obedience, which was completely unimaginable until now.
The world is falling at breakneck speed into a dark dystopian state, the deepest essence of which we should understand if we do not want everything to be destroyed. As we have already talked about several times, concepts are one of the most crucial elements of human understanding, because through them we can grasp the connections of the external world in the inner spiritual world of consciousness. Concepts therefore serve to make the external world narratable for a human community.
However, for this process to be successful, it is necessary that the deepest meaning of the concepts is the same for all members of the community. If this self-identity of the meaning of the concepts is damaged, the community will be in big trouble, because it will not be able to talk about its situation and discuss its tasks, so it will not be able to act thoughtfully and in a coordinated manner. One of the most decisive goals of the global identity war taking place today is precisely this, the confusion of the unified meaning of concepts, the destruction of the main element of human understanding. French sociologist Michel Foucault described these processes with dramatic precision decades before in his work entitled Les mots et les choses (Words and Things) His work is subtitled the Archeology of the Social Sciences , which is a direct reference to the fact that the key to understanding the deepest essence of the human world is words and things, that is, the prehistory of the conceptual grasp of the world. This also means that control over the meaning of words is the deepest and most important position of power. In addition, an absolutely "invisible" and therefore completely uncontrollable power is essentially incomprehensible to the common sense of observation.
When we tend to refer to this "non-existent" global superpower, we usually fall into a trap, since we cannot verify this assumption precisely because those who exercise this hidden meaning-determining power immediately accuse us of creating conspiracy theories and/or hate speech. And let's face it, anyone who is ignorant, believes in "conspiracies" and/or is evil, and therefore speaks hate, essentially "writes" himself out of history, but certainly from the space of speech that can be taken seriously. What is happening in today's world is none other than the intense activity of this meaning-determining main power. This global chief constructor, or rather chief destructor, continuously manufactures those concepts which are either "empty", i.e. completely meaningless, because they are constructed in such a way that everyone uses them with whatever meaning they want, so they are "meaningless" in the strict sense of the word. , or they are intended to stigmatize in the first place, so use them as a weapon.
Anti-Semitism, as a concept circulating in the discourse, is both at the same time. It is partly meaningless, because everyone uses it as they want, and partly a weapon of destruction, immediately written out of existence on whomever it is applied. To support this assumption, let me quote a well-known liberal public speaker, who described the meeting that took place in the Dohany Street synagogue a few years ago between Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu and the Prime Ministers of the V4 countries with the following sentence with witty irony and self-irony.
"Budapest has never seen so many pro-Israel anti-Semites and anti-Semitic Jews in the same airspace."
I think this sentence describes more precisely than any analysis, the essence and historical context of which was given by the aforementioned Michel Foucault. The Jewish religion is one of the most ancient sacred cultures in the world, and as such it is the formulator of the deepest traditions of human existence, the system of moral norms that follows from this tradition, the Ten Commandments are its historical imprint. A person's gender self-identity, the man and woman who make up the family, is formed by acquiring the role of father and mother by giving birth to offspring. This is the most basic identity layer of human existence, so it is completely understandable that the Ten Commandments consider this the main moral foundation of self-identity. Whoever turns against this, turns against the highest order of all human existence, and thus grossly violates the deepest layer of Jewish culture. The fundamental goal of this destructive endeavor cannot be anything other than the decision of the human world into chaos, and this unfortunately seems to be successful, at least for the time being. In order to stop this fatal existence-liquidation process, it would be necessary above all to reveal the working mechanisms of this "invisible" and of course "non-existent" meaning-power complex, so that it becomes visible to the well-meaning but deceived and/or intimidated majority of the world. what is unfortunately still "invisible" today. But maybe we will be able to make it visible.
"And the Lord sent down on Sodom and Gomorrah brimstone and fiery rain from the Lord from the sky," we can read in the 24th verse of the first book of Moses on the pages of the Vizsoli Bible. These two cities were destroyed because of the behavior of the inhabitants that was not pleasing to God: for example, the local men wanted to "know" Lot's two male guests by force, and they insisted on this even when Lot offered his two daughters instead of his guests. From time to time, an event reminiscent of Sodom takes place in the capital of the Hungarians. Since even then the organizers of the events are acting against the book of Moses, can the suspicion of anti-Semitism arise?
As I have already mentioned, anti-Semitism as a meta-concept that is partly without meaning, thus used completely arbitrarily, and partly as a means of meaning and power used as a weapon to stigmatize is not suitable to help us get closer to understanding the world. Rather, it serves to sink us even deeper into the murderous global war of narratives trying to destroy each other. Anyone who goes against the traditions of one of the world's most ancient cultures, the Jewish religion, is "against everything" and wants to eradicate the entire human existence. But if we are talking about the Old Alliance, perhaps it is worth recalling László Németh's dramatic sentence that the bloody womb of human history is revealed in the Old Alliance. Yes, human history is born in blood and dirt, between devastating disasters and infinitely uplifting miracles. Now we seem to be sinking into the filth again, but we can learn from the examples of the Old Covenant what should be done to restore the dignified order, the dignity of the order of life, to which Moses refers.
The full interview HERE .
Cover image: teveszmek.blog.hu