Fourteen member states of the European Union, including Germany and France, propose the creation of a rapid reaction military force capable of immediate intervention in the event of an international crisis. Pál Molnár asked economics professor László Bogár.
- ...Fourteen EU member states...according to the European Union must establish a force of at least five thousand soldiers, in order to be able to provide assistance to non-EU governments in need of urgent intervention if necessary. From the beginning, the EU was an economic and not a military community. The Lisbon Treaty is not about external law enforcement...
- The fundamental condition for the exercise of power is that the person exercising power must be able to permanently enforce his will and even use legal force to transfer it to those over whom he exercises his power. This logically requires an internal law enforcement force and a military force capable of protecting this sovereignty, thus using legal force in the event of an external attack. It must be emphasized here that even this legitimate form of using open violence is very costly and risky , so it should only be used as a last resort for exercising power...
...NATO, established in 1949, is America's imperial military strike force representing the global power superstructure, which militarily marked Europe's "place" on the world map from the start. Although it seems that the militarily strong France, Great Britain and Germany are the decisive players of NATO, this is an illusion. Any European state can have any force on its own, the global imperial structure of NATO makes Europe militarily unintelligible. That is why any attempt to create an independent European military strike force is false and deceitful...
Photo: György T. Szántó/Demokrata
...Behind this emerging "idea" lies the strategic goal of the global empire to make relations between the elements of the Eurasian cooperation system (Europe, Russia, China) as hostile as possible. The main front line of this would be Ukraine today and Belarus, which could be made hostile to Russia in the future. The deployment of such a "European force" in this region would be more legitimate than if the global empire turned directly against Russia through NATO. In other words, such a "European force" could actually be just an "advertising bag" to visually cover up the global empire's open aggression against Russia , which would have to be wrapped in such a way...
with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg in the framework of an unofficial working lunch NATO proved impotent against the Islamic invasion. Stoltenberg announced last fall that he wants to "fight" against climate change; external observers therefore deemed medical treatment necessary. The creation of an EU army would make the pointlessness of NATO even more obvious...
- The position of Secretary General of NATO can only be given to a person who has shown unconditional loyalty to the Empire in all its manifestations during his entire political career. Jens Stoltenberg is exactly such a figure, as the president of the youth organization of the Norwegian Labor Party, and then as prime minister of the party itself, he was led solely by devotion to the Empire, which is how he got his "reward" with the NATO General Secretariat. Its main task is to carry any imperial decision through the machinery at any cost, so it is a simple technical element in the system...
...Migration, climate and the virus as the great "world themes" of the Empire are all about the same thing, and that is total control and obedience. They serve to eliminate the European Christian white man as a historical entity once and for all, and to make the rest "strictly controlled"... NATO as an imperial force is the main facilitator of migration, and since the "climate" issue is a global energy weapon against Russia and China , so the general secretary's statements on these issues also perfectly serve the Empire's strategy... The entire dead-end way of life of the modern West has reached its final phase, the last stage of chaos and disintegration , as Oswald Spengler predicted in his epochal work The Twilight of the West. This process of degradation could only be reversed by a dramatic event, followed by a radical spiritual change. On a purely theoretical level, we cannot rule out the possibility of this, but its probability is very low...
Author: Pál Molnár
The full interview can be read here.
(Cover photo: Jens Stoltenberg. Image source: hu.euronews.com)
