Marci is nervous

on 444 Márton Gulyás about why the united opposition should boycott the final vote on the pedophile bill due today.

It is remarkable in itself how a left-wing political activist, who was not elected by anyone, gives a public lecture to the elected, but luckily, minority opposition politicians about what exactly they should do in the parliament. But we are already used to this, the tail-wagging dog as a phenomenon is specific to the Hungarian left. So much for the choreography, but the content itself is much more interesting.

The author uses the attitude of the opposition regarding migration as an example, and writes with vigorous passion about the Hungarian opposition, which supports the border fence and rejects illegal immigrants.

"During the refugee crisis, the opposition communicated in vain that they not only approve of the fence system euphemized as the southern border lock, but that they themselves would maintain it if they were elected: this is why Fidesz consistently accused the opposition of tearing down the fence if they came to power."

For my part, I have never understood how anyone can go so far as to deny the obvious and lie about something that is easily justified, even if the political memory of the God-given people is beyond measure and notoriously short-term, but that is my problem. In its June 18, 2015 article, Népszava wrote about the opposition "supporting" the border closure:

"Several politicians of the MSZP in the capital temporarily closed the headquarters of Fidesz on Lendvay Street in Budapest with a fence on Thursday, sending the message that politicians who carry out a hate campaign should be "behind bars". The other opposition parties also strongly opposed the border closure, which was announced yesterday by Péter Szijjártó. DK asks Orbán who will implement the allegedly 22 billion investment. The PM also stretched fence wire around Kossuth Square and sat behind it... At a press conference, Ágnes Kunhalmi emphasized that a country that builds a wall at its borders and thus "locks itself in a ghetto" is going to ruin itself... She added that immigration is a fake problem created by Fidesz ... According to the DK, it is also possible that István Garancsi, the owner of Videoton FC, or the mayor of Felcsút, Lőrinc Mészáros, will raise the "iron curtain" on the Hungarian-Serbian border... According to the Dialogue for Hungary (PM), the government wants such a fence for 22 billion forints to drag on the Hungarian-Serbian border, which only serves to incite hatred."

Gulyás therefore "argues" that although the opposition "supported" the southern border closure, the evil government claimed the exact opposite about them, accusing our citizens of opposing the fence. Consequently, if the anti-pedophile draft law is voted on today, the government will still consider them to be pedophile patrons, and we propagandists will not fail to write this. So, this is one of the arguments why the opposition should boycott the vote. But Marci has a better argument than this, which reads as follows:

"The law will have unforeseeable consequences if it is passed in its current form. The Polish so-called Two years after the decision enabling the introduction of »LGBTQ-free zones«, which more than a hundred Polish regions, counties and municipalities took advantage of, in March 2021 the European Union declared itself a zone of LGBTQ freedom and froze the program funding of six Polish settlements. The Hungarian effort, which would legalize citizen discrimination, would have unforeseeable consequences for EU resources as well."

Let's savor this paragraph for a bit because, contrary to the author's intention, it is perhaps the most important part of the whole thing. Because what is it about? Marci himself describes that more than a hundred Polish regions, counties and municipalities took advantage of the opportunity to declare themselves a zone free from the gay lobby. That is, quite a lot of people. The question is, does anyone in the EU have the right to say thank you, we don't ask for your violent ideologies? It seems that there is, but it involves the withdrawal of resources. However, the EU member states do not receive the development resources to give space to deviance that openly targets children against their will, even if it is wrapped in rainbow robes, but because they have opened their markets. This was the original deal, which the Brussels elite bends as they go, according to their whims.

And then let's see what caused the liberal hysteria because of the bill, why there was a demonstration yesterday, and why 65,000 people signed the " Budapest Pride petition against the Russian-style homophobic propaganda law". They have a problem with the addition, which they say "conflicts those who commit the crime of sexual abuse or coercion with non-heterosexual people who want to live freely in their chosen gender."

The new law states that sexual education at school cannot be aimed at promoting gender change or homosexuality, and education can only be carried out by state-approved organizations other than school teachers. According to the Hungarian government, they have so far carried out sensitization programs as part of anti-discrimination educational activities, which can cause serious damage to children's physical, mental and moral development. The draft law would also prohibit any content that deviates from the self-identity corresponding to the sex at birth, changes it, or promotes homosexuality.

Marci thinks it's terrible, but I think it's completely correct. And I would hazard a guess, according to the vast majority of parents raising preschool and school-aged children. The LGBT lobby is not playing for equality before the law - that was given to them a long time ago - but wants additional rights. And they don't want to achieve these extra rights through their performance, but simply through their sexual orientation that differs from normal - yes, heterosexuality is normality -. They have the same rights as heterosexuals, and anyone who says otherwise is not telling the truth. For example, in Hungary, no one can marry a person of the same sex. Neither heterosexual nor homosexual. Of course, heterosexuals do not even claim this, but this does not mean that they have additional rights either.

However, the watershed in the issue is still the behavior that endangers the physical and mental health of our children. LGBT organizations loudly shout homophobia and attach other labels to the vast majority of society, to those of us who do not take kindly to the rise of deviance. But still, what do they imagine? To go into schools and kindergartens and promote the gay lobby to children under the heading of sensitization? Convince them that hormone treatment and gender reassignment surgery are a good thing, that they will be happier and healthier? Is it possible to change the biological sex at all, all that is needed is a drastic, irreversible mutilation, and rips-rops, the woman becomes a man and the man becomes a woman? Do they really believe that they have every right to potentially cripple the lives of other people's children? The main question is, do the parents have the right to say no to this? Can the vast majority say no to the arrogant and violent behavior of a loud, marginal minority that has targeted our minor children?

Cover photo: Gábor Bankó