Of course, there are two types of journalists. There is the independent lens, and there is us. Oh, sorry, we're not even journalists, but vile propagandists, lousy penmen of the lackey media.
What characterizes us? First of all, we are formations. Also rats . They are retarded, snotty, bigoted fascists who don't even understand the most basic concepts. Those who utter the nonsense that democracy is not dictatorship , that freedom of the press means that everyone expresses their opinion as their conscience (and reality, the facts!) dictates. Outdated people who believe that Hungarians are one nation and that people should be asked about important things from time to time, because the government does not have a people, but the people have a government. Stupid tulks who claim that children can only be born from the love of a woman and a man , that men cannot give birth , that there are not 128 thousand different sexes , and so on, are on the wrong path.
On the other hand, highly educated, hyper-informed and up-to-date independent lenses always tell the truth and, according to the old saying, they are always right. Two: if not, the first point applies.
They are never wrong and do not describe lies and false information with their great 200-word vocabulary. After all , whatever is written down, just because it was written down, it immediately becomes true. They don't need to check anything, and of course they don't. They are revealed.
Just a small example from the offer of the deservedly unknown factory of lies and hatred called OLKT. I will not write down the names of those involved in the case, because it is not about individuals, but about the profession (if it is allowed to talk about such things at all). About authenticity, if they know that term (I don't think so). Well, independent lenses "unmasked" the head of a non-governmental organization, envisioning him as an agent. They didn't bother to check who it was, so they associated the past of a dead agent with the same name.
Failed, we would say, but we will not hear or read such things from them, because it is not the basic nature of independent lenses to admit their mistakes. Neither does the band of political adventurers they serve.
Independently objective scribblers know better than this: if they take sides, if they spread lies and fall down, they will surely keep it quiet as if nothing had happened. Their role model is the BBC, which is now a truly independent and objective globalist news trumpet. It did the same. They did not manage to flatten, ram into the ground, or even crucify the Péter Szijjártó , so they blocked the publication of the interview, so as not to reveal the extent of the lies in the writings of the globalists to the contrary.
But we have to follow their sames, since they also do nothing but their domestic and foreign masters. They sputter, curse, insult, but if they receive a refuting answer, they refuse to publish it. Real communist meanness cut from the ground up, according to the old pattern. In other words, if someone is accused, he is guilty from the beginning, because (replacing the term communist with globalist, which is a dog) the globalist does not persecute the innocent, so if the globalist persecutes someone, he cannot be innocent from the beginning.
Alright boys and girls, keep it up! Preserving traditions is a beautiful thing, although perhaps it doesn't matter what kind of traditions you preserve and cherish. It seems that you - in modern times - claim the tradition of the owner of the Ószöd speech as your own: to lie in the morning, at night and in the evening.
Only you do it better, because you don't tell the truth for the rest of the day.
Cover image source: Pixabay
