Knowing the events in Afghanistan, one can be sure that the women living there are as far from equality as the Earth is from the edge of the Galaxy. Even though the US tried to emancipate Afghanistan. Moreover, he also wanted to impose gender ideology on the devout, fanatical Muslims. This is also a complete failure, not only the "democratization" of Afghanistan. Historian Mária Schmidt, director general of the House of Terror Museum, wrote an opinion article about this on the Látószög blog.
In 1963, outgoing Harald Macmillan handed over the baton to his young successor with the warning that: "as long as you don't want to occupy Afghanistan, everything will be fine."
The new US Vice President, Kamala Harris, declared on March 8, 2021, International Women's Day, that "the world is still not working as it should for women!" Why does it work for men? Why the elderly, children, etc. does it work for you? Why should the world work in such a way that women are good? Who commissioned, who empowered Kamala Harris to speak for the women of the world? Why isn't it enough to advocate for American women? It would be nice if you could get them to have the discounts and subsidies that Hungarian women have.
It also demands an explanation as to why Western progressives focus exclusively on the liberation and protection of the interests of minorities. Do they think the majority are already liberated? Are their interests already asserted?
"We have to raise the standard. Until half of Congress is women, half of whom are people of color, we most likely will not have a democracy.” - he continued. This democracy has become an interesting expression. On the one hand, it constantly changes its meaning, which is understandable, because times and norms are constantly changing and changing, and on the other hand, it has become a catchphrase, the absence of which delegitimizes, makes it impossible, immediately puts you in a corner and brands you as an enemy. So, the USA - which until now considered itself the custodian of democracy and classified the democratic performance of others - according to its own, number two leader, does not itself qualify as a democracy. This is all the more regrettable because, if not precisely because of the above, but more and more people, more and more often, for more and more reasons, we see it the same way.
As for the number of female congressmen and other quotas, the elite of the USA, which has become the new wok, is not kidding. In 2004, when a new constitution was adopted by the occupied Afghans, the mandatory percentage of female representatives was set at 27%, which was then higher than in the USA! Today, America has replaced both the old business-based objective function and the Christian religion. Today, they have transformed themselves into neophyte propagators of the religion of women and gender. I am talking about gender religion and prioritizing the status of minorities above all else.
Let's look at all this in Afghanistan. It is possible to have a meaningful debate about which stage of the development of tribal societies Afghanistan is currently in, but it requires perversion and feeble-mindedness if anyone imagines that it is possible to carve out of it the Netherlands of the region with one leap (And why?). Still, diplomats and other experts who graduated from the prohibitively expensive Ivy-League universities believed that they could turn Afghanistan into a counterpart to the Harvard campus with fire and iron. That's why they spent 787 million dollars with the US government agencies on gender programs there! The actual amount is, of course, much higher, because every American idea and initiative included mandatory gender goals. A few hundred Afghan fighters have been trained to talk about the "gender role" they occupy and "what are the male behaviors that women find offensive." The number of women in the Afghan army to be established has been set at 10%. [1] How come there was no one in Washington or on the ground who told them that they were dealing with religious, sometimes fanatical Muslims?
In order for the Afghans to vote for and apparently tolerate all this, they had to be constantly blackmailed. The Americans were foreign occupiers, imperialist conquerors without it, but the imposition of this gender-religious allowance on the Afghans added to all of this by making it obvious what an immoral, corrupt world they represent. Is it any wonder that there is no supporter left behind?
