There is no doubt that it is time to rename the European Court of Human Rights. The correct name would be: European Court of Criminal Rights. The legality of the change was recently earned by the not-at-all-respectable body itself with some decisions.
In a statement, the Hungarian Ministry of Justice announced the scandalous decision of the court, in which it made a decision condemning the Hungarian state in the case of four cruel criminals sentenced to actual imprisonment. Here is the announcement:
"On June 17, 2021, the European Court of Human Rights announced a verdict in the case of four Hungarian citizens serving actual life sentences, according to which the Hungarian State violated the European Convention on Human Rights.
In addition to the Hungarian State's violation, the ECHR awarded two applicants 2,000 euros in court costs. The applicants were perpetrators of serious crimes.
The first applicant was convicted of murder for profit and armed robbery committed in a criminal organization, while the second and third applicants were convicted of murdering six people, including a four-and-a-half-year-old child, with particular cruelty, racially motivated and in a criminal organization, as well as a number of related crimes ( armed robberies and crimes involving firearms). The fourth applicant was convicted of several attempted murders with particular cruelty for profit, as well as several counts of robbery and assault. The verdict is not final, but as a result, the sovereignty of our country may be damaged, because the decision goes against the strictness of the Hungarian penal policy.
Therefore, the Ministry of Justice, on behalf of the Government of Hungary, requested today that the case be submitted to the Grand Chamber of the Court and the judgment reviewed. The achievements of Hungarian penal policy speak for themselves, thanks to which our country is one of the safest countries in the world.
In the case of the relevant criminals, the Government continues to rule out the possibility of conditional release according to the current regulations, and also insists that the actual life sentence should last the life of the convicted person and that the opportunity to examine the possibility of release should only be possible after 40 years have passed at the earliest. Publisher: Ministry of Justice"
Apart from the "trifle" that the above-mentioned court grossly violates the freedom of judgment and interferes in the Hungarian legal order , so ignoring this, it can be clearly stated: with their judgment, they stand for the criminals and not the victims.
We know that Western jurisprudence infected with so-called liberalism - not only in the field of human rights - has long lacked not only rationality, but also fairness. Just think of the sentences in which migrants who rape women are acquitted (of course, if the perpetrator is a native, don't expect a light sentence), even murderers can easily get away with it if they are immigrants (were their minds confused???), but let them do it. Everyone has a human right to cut their own neck. (Even before they explain anything in this half-sentence, I translate it as libs with reduced intellectual ability and grossly malicious: each one destroys his life as he wants, so the half-sentence has a figurative meaning!)
However, no one, not even a European human rights court, has the right to do the same with the lives of others. Especially not with ours, because if it were up to them, the killers wouldn't stay behind bars for long. Because they also have human rights, right?
I don't think the killer has one. Whoever is able to take the lives of others - for any reason - has written himself out of the people by his act.
Only humans can have human rights.
