On February 17, Péter Márki-Zay, the candidate for prime minister of the left, gave his year-evaluation, or more precisely "country evaluation" speech. "Fate took my hand and guided my steps. "Hundreds of thousands saw hope in me, and I accepted their call," the left-wing prime ministerial candidate colored his speech with such and similar thoughts, Mandiner wrote.

Gábor Horn , chairman of the Republikon foundation's board of trustees, evaluated the speech on Klubrádio He said: this thing went particularly well, it was clever and good compared to Orbán's one-man, guiding principle annual review.

According to the former SZDSZ politician, the representatives of the parties spoke with restraint, but in their own style. According to him, Márki-Zay was very good : "he was concrete, and now we were able to find out what they want, what are their tangible, accountable promises, and the interested parties could hear this in a good presentation, so he thinks the event was very successful". According to Gábor Horn, Márki-Zay's speech was a very good counterpoint to "Orbán, who is tricking both the opposition and the opposition voters".

He put it like this: Márki-Zay's style is unusual, but this is where he sees his strength, compared to the critics. The voter may think that he is like him, Horn believes. According to him, it was a disciplined speech, but basically it doesn't work like "the calculated Orbán speeches, which can actually be issued together with the order of applause". He added: the mayor of Hódmezővásárhely can apologize for any mistakes.

2022plus: Well, dear Gábor, this is really a weak Márki caress! Apart from the "trifle" that the candidate for Prime Minister of Ballibek fought against the facts about degraded healthcare and moral and economic decline (he is the one who beats his children and happily represents communists and fascists too!), he accused the Fidesz-KDNP government of , that he is campaigning with welfare measures before the election. The fact is: Fidesz has been "campaigning" with this for 12 years. After that, MZP opened the box of promises, i.e. it promised everything to everyone.

Now, Gábor, it would be nice to know who actually rated it. Furthermore, there is a question as to what MZP kept quiet about, which it has already revealed to the evaluator. First of all, we could recognize Gyurcsány's intentions in the speech, DK's plans echoed. Second: the Ballib katyvaz - afraid of what nonsense their man will speak again - also paraded his "big guns". I wonder what Gergely Karácsony, Máté Kanász-Nagy, Ágnes Kunhalmi, Anna Donáth, Péter Jakab and Klára Dobrev when the "captain" evaluates?

You say that now we have found out what they want, what the accountable promises are. You know, Gábor, we knew this, unfortunately, even without an annual appraiser . As for accountability, there is no such thing on the ballib side, and it never was. Either they lie about what they promised, or they wave, saying that election promises should not be taken seriously. This was already clearly proven by the Medgyessy-Gyurcsány-Bajnai period.

You say Márki-Zay's style is unusual. You know, this is a very chiseled formulation of unlimited greed. We don't want to get used to insulting the country's population on a daily basis, and Petya is strong in this. By the way, I really hope that the majority of the voters do not want to feel that they are "like him", because that would certainly show a lack of proper education.

We also know that the savior of Hódmezővásárhely can apologize. Several times a day. But we'd be much happier if you had no reason to do it. The problem is that you have to. Some for fixing lamps, some from women, pensioners, Fidesz (although he didn't apologize to them and didn't say what he did in the other cases: I didn't mean to say what I said), some from the disabled. Imagine this figure as prime minister trying to tell foreign negotiating partners that "I didn't mean to say that".

I'm telling you, in your recent speech, you managed to say something for which you should apologize again. Of course he won't, he didn't say what he said. Because now he not only classified the settlers, who were most likely of Hungarian origin, as migrants, but he also classified them as criminals. It would be good if you told Petyus, after this it is even less advisable for him to travel to Transylvania.

(Cover image source: YouTube)