Left-wing scandal in Hajdú-Bihar: In 2019, Gergő Salamon, the right-wing parliamentary candidate from Jobbik, produced and submitted false recommendations in the municipal elections in Hajdú-Bihar county. As it turned out, he copied the personal data of residents of Téglás and Hajdúhadháza, presumably from previous regularly or irregularly compiled lists and forged the signatures of voters on the recommendation forms he collected.
According to Origo's information on this, in the city of Téglás, the sheets that were the subject of the report were placed anonymously in a mailbox on a CD, where it is clearly visible that the recommendations were filled out in the same way, with the same handwriting, in hundreds of cases. Many stakeholders claim that they never gave their names to Jobbik and did not support Gergő Salamon either. There was also the suspicion that, by repeating the actions of 2019, they could similarly obtain recommendations on the left during the 2022 elections. A complaint was filed in the case.
According to our information, signatures were collected for Fidesz in the city of Téglás, and those who had already signed before, but according to their claim, did not sign for Jobbik in 2019, as they appear on the forms on the included CD. Comparing the current Fidesz recommendations with the 2019 Right-wing forms, it is clear that the signatures of the people on the two forms differ significantly from each other.
Several people came forward and said that they had not given their names to the lists in question before, they did not support either Jobbik or Gergő Salamon. Four of them also testified to the police in this matter.
It is clearly visible on the forms that someone filled them all in the same script and signed them instead of the people. So it can be said that during the 2019 local government election, Jobbik's nomination forms contained fake signatures.
Source: origo.hu
Since the collection of recommendations during the 2022 parliamentary elections took place recently, there are well-founded suspicions that Gergő Salamon, the candidate of the left, also used this method when collecting the recommendations necessary to become a candidate in the parliamentary election on April 3.
In the case of mass falsification, there is also the suspicion of a crime against the order of the election, so the Election Commission should cooperate with the investigative authority to prevent the candidate from participating in the election illegally or fulfilling the recommendations necessary to become a candidate under illegal conditions.
However, his immunity protects Gergő Salamon until the day of the election, so the investigative authority can only carry out its investigative work after that.
In the case, a report was filed due to the well-founded suspicion of the offense of using a false private document, a crime against the order of elections, referendums and European citizens' initiative, and the offense of misuse of personal data.
What does Péter Jakab say about this, or what do the founders with experience and representative history say about this?
What does Péter Márki-Zay say about this, because it has already been clearly proven that he is a private document-forger, his candidate for Hungary in the Union?
Will Gergő Salamon resign and apologize to the deceived voters?
Source and full article: origo.hu
Featured Image: Facebook
