Around the time of the first free election that ended the Kádár era, i.e. at the time of my indulgence in politics, like most of the residents of our region, I myself was inclined to observe the surface and draw conclusions from it. Of course, it was obvious from the beginning that the most important thing in politics is not the statements made (apart from those with rare historical weight), but the action. That the activities of a public figure serve, willy-nilly.
Because it doesn't matter what the actor or his media environment brings up as an interpretation, if a more concrete reality than words unfolds from the structure of his actions. We can remember the demand that emerged in the revolutionary movements after World War I to open up the secret diplomacy that dragged a long line of countries into war. This is approx. it became like "Let the politics be different!" domestic program: none. Philanthropic lip service continued on the surface, while the witch's kitchen of politics continued to operate in the depths.
For a long time, those who thought they discovered invisible group interest(s) behind the events were successfully ridiculed for a long time. But eye-opening experiences were collected; it was like this, e.g. when German Chancellor Helmut Kohl recommend Gyula Horn József Antall's government... In general, I have noticed that the right-wing politicians of the desired West are more attracted to the people who were previously "in position", who also served the new world powers relatively cheaply, and not us - their values are only partially divisive, and therefore tougher negotiators – are preferred.
However, the dumping of the lie was still to come.
With the development of communication tools, a new chapter has opened in the mass application of deception. Alternative media emerged alongside the mainstream. Of course, the free expression of opinion, which is boosted by freelance journalism, is also rowing in murky waters. Today, not only truth seekers, but secret services and all kinds of small and large group interests are behind each news source, and this creates a headache for the common man. Of course, after reading a lot, tendencies emerge here too, and even the typical use of words and concepts, and the style, are often revealing. In the evaluation of the events, the methodological identity behind the events can be particularly revealing.
At first, it seemed plausible that the people of each country - even one after the other - would be caught up in the revolutionary fervor; but when the same scenario seems to be realized in the so-called "color revolutions", the suspicion of alienation certainly arises. As in the case of certain government changes taking place in one fell swoop, during which "world bankers" were increasingly placed in the position of country's leader. To mention only the most well-known: Emmanuel Macron Dimitris Lukasz Papadímosz who accepted the Greek financial austerity package Mario Draghi , who was placed at the head of the government formed in Italy without elections .
A popular method is to use the media to hurl accusations of corruption down the opponent's neck. Of course, only when noticing the illegal acquisition of money, where there is resistance in relation to the efforts of the United States of Europe and the effort to assert national interests emerges. Such was Silvio Berlusconi due to European financial pressure in 2011; Francois Fillon , the French Republican Party's presidential candidate , in 2017, when he was made the target of an embezzlement procedure during the election campaign: thus clearing the way for Macron's election as president. The Ibiza scandal also swept away a right-wing government in Austria in 2019. -Chancellor of the Freedom Party (FPÖ) Heinz-Christian Strache was overthrown and even convicted in a court of law, Andrej Babiš, who was next to us in V4, was brought down under similar suspicions. Italy 2018-2019. Matteo Salvini, the right-wing interior minister who served in the 1980s (he was also deputy prime minister), was put on trial for his measures to curb the influx of migrants.
We have seen the typical targets so far; although, by mentioning the state leaders given by the international financial world, I have already referred to the "brilliant children" of globalism. Here, the palette is colorful. Skilled subversives and controlled puppets appear in the advanced positions of the major world powers. Let's take a couple of examples.
Miheil Szaaksvili , was in the news for a long time, and then appeared again and again . There, he also stirred up two countries experiencing the agonies of regime change: Georgia and Ukraine. When I met him in Tbilisi, he boasted about his American law degree and practice. He came back to Georgia at the end of 1995 and was immediately elected as a representative. Between 2004 and 2013 he became the President of Georgia; then, after his fall, he participated Viktor Yanukovych . In 2015, the then new president of Ukraine, Petro Poroshenko, appointed him the head of the body managing the political transformation of Ukraine, and then the head of the Odesa Territorial State Administration Office, the governor of the territory. But soon he came face to face with Poroshenko, and he was deported from Ukraine to Poland. He organized a party and took part in the 2021 Ukrainian parliamentary election, and then the new Ukrainian president, Zelensky , appointed Saakashvili as head of the National Reform Council responsible for state reforms. In the meantime, criminal proceedings were underway against him at home for abuse of his presidential power; so when he returned home for the Georgian local elections, he was imprisoned.
Less colorful, but also typical, Kiril Petrov , the Prime Minister of Bulgaria. With his university studies at Harvard in the background, he returned home to Bulgarian politics. In 2021, he came to power by forcing three consecutive elections, attacking the corruption of the government led by Boyko Borisov Zaev replaced the current national government led by Nikola Gruevski
So far, I have mentioned the signs of an emerging reality. However, we haven't had to research so carefully for some time. What happens is that the globalist forces drop the mask. György Soros could no longer resist the urge to show his power and proclaim his "beautiful new world" with prophetic vigor. Most recently, he also predicted the defeat of Hungary and the Third World War. And the scene where, during the financier's visit to Europe, the then leader of our Union, Jean Claude Juncker, readily rushes towards him for a comradely kiss, which he also licks on his picture, was a spotlight on his power stemming from his network of connections.
However, one of the most beautiful cases of open confession Victoria Nuland to the press on December 13, according to which the United States has "invested" 5 billion dollars in the upheaval in Ukraine.
(It was revealed about the same white person at the end of January, when his phone conversation with the American ambassador to Ukraine came to light, that his European policy was: "Fuck the EU!") In a word, today, his dirty intentions have been exposed. Therefore, it is no longer persuasion, but censorship that has taken over in the Western press and in the media labeled as antisocial. The most blatant example of this was the blocking of the US president, Donald Trump . At the levels of social contact, communication is distorted, just as it was under communist rule. Employers and employees, teachers and students alike are forced to take a stand. And honest opinions are relegated to the comments. That's why we often feel that today politicians don't even debate in parliaments, but rather stigmatize each other.
The situation has developed that in order to argue in favor of what is right, we must mobilize the power of mass democracy (see: Peace Process). This was successful in Hungary, and we trust that the success will make others our followers.
Author: András Kelemen
