WHO has updated its manual on gender equality, in particular the key concepts related to gender have been modernized. However, it is also written in the document that there are not only male and female genders - it can be read on the portal of the V4NA news agency.
The World Health Organization (WHO) has announced on its website an update of its gender manual, which focuses mainly on updating key concepts related to gender equality. The update also states that there isn't just male and female genders. The first edition of the 146-page handbook in 2011 has now been revised in light of new scientific evidence and conceptual advances related to gender equality, health and development.
But the revisions have baffled biologists, as it is not at all clear what new scientific evidence has emerged to support the claim that more than two do not exist. It is also not clear what terms such as "conceptual development" mean in this context.
However, it has become clear that the WHO confuses the scientific concept of biological sex with an individual's indefinable and subjective gender identity.
The WHO wants to prove with the existence of intersex persons that there are not only two genders - male and female - Colin Wright , the term intersex does not refer to a third gender, but rather an umbrella term for developmental states that result in sexually ambiguous genitalia. For there not to be more than two, there would have to be another type of gamete in addition to the sperm or egg around which the primary reproductive anatomy of the individual could be organized.
Dr. Karleen Gribble , an obstetrician at the University of Western Sydney, told the Daily Mail that “the wording that there is not only male and female gender is worrying. According to the website, the handbook is updated in light of new scientific evidence and conceptual advances related to gender, health and development. However , there is no new scientific evidence to suggest that more than two genders exist. The idea that there are more than two genders is a postmodern, unscientific notion that the WHO should not be endorsing."
2022plus: On the other hand, based on the manual, it can be scientifically proven that the WHO is no longer the World Health Organization, but a cowardly gang that knows nothing about scientific facts. Or, if they do know the facts, a community of villains who have joined with other villains to destroy our psyches. But we can put it another way: there really are not only men and women, but also lying idiots.
Source: V4Na
(Header image: flickr.com)
