I am reading the review of DK TV's latest broadcast on Mandiner , in which two particularly thought-provoking expressions caught my attention.
As it is written, this week, István Vágó, Olga Kálmán, János Palotás, and Zsolt Gréczy attacked DK's Internet TV, which started on December 2.
The first topic was Monday's EU agreement, during which Zsolt Gréczy said:
"Now let's think about it, if someone else is the prime minister and he brings home an agreement that there is a pile of money that doesn't come home: the city would have been set on fire, shop windows would have been smashed, it would be a huge treason".
István Vágó boasted that even though Fidesz used to betray the country, the Hungarian opposition MEPs represent "the real national interest" in Brussels.
There would be nothing wrong with someone having a different opinion, but if it has nothing to do with reality, then that is a problem. I don't think there should be a debate about who represents the real national interest in Brussels. Because Mr. Vágó would hardly be able to point out any of the hundreds of EP representatives who are working against his own nation. The only exceptions to this are the Hungarian opposition representatives. So let's just say that the few Mamluks from SE do not represent the nation, and although they claim to belong to the nation, they are rather – as they consider themselves – European Hungarians. And the two are not to be confused.
The statement of Máté Kocsis was discussed as a second topic. The leader of the Fidesz faction accused Gyurcsányist László Varju of spreading horror stories in the service of foreign interests, saying that the savings of the public are in danger and that the best solution is "for people to cancel their bank deposits".
Mira Vágó:
"Any opposition format that says something, they immediately realize that it is for dollars. On the other hand, the situation is that they receive support from here and there, - and if there is something illegal about it, then it shouldn't be done, but I don't think there is - but they get support because they say what they say. " István Vágó stated.
The sentence doesn't end like that. Perhaps it would be correct: "they get the support because they say what they say" to them, or what is expected of them for the nice little sum.
With your permission, Mr. Vágó, you have already given an incorrect answer to the 20 forint question, so I would like to draw your attention to Einstein's saying.
