LifeNews.com reported that Joe Biden finally lost a lawsuit over whether the Democratic administration could force Christian doctors to kill fetuses (more elegantly called abortions).
So far, the American president and his administration have stood up to countless, particularly harmful, anti-human cases with full chest width, only one of which would have been the one in which they would have deprived doctors who refused abortion for reasons of conscience of their free decision. This also includes not being able to force doctors and hospitals to perform gender reassignment surgeries. If Biden's attempt had been successful, the doctors and nurses who refused to operate could have even lost their jobs.
In the trial, the defenders of life were represented by Beckett. It is an American-based organization that serves to protect religious freedom, represents religious organizations and individuals of faith, with considerable success. The lawsuit, which has been going through several forums for years, recently ended with the result that
the court ruled that religious doctors could not be forced to perform procedures, such as abortions, that violated their faith.
The anti-life lobby wanted to continue the lawsuit, which it lost several times, in the Supreme Court, but the Biden administration waived the right to appeal. Of course, this was not announced, but on the contrary
they missed the last appeal deadline, i.e. June 20, thus the decision became final.
Becket Vice President and General Counsel Luke Goodrich commented on their victory: " Physicians take a solemn oath to 'do no harm,' and they cannot uphold that oath when the federal government forces them to perform harmful, irreversible procedures against their conscience." and despite their medical expertise.”
The abortion lobby argued in favor of "mandatory murder" that those who refuse to intervene discriminate against those who want to terminate their pregnancies (ie kill their fetuses!) or change their birth gender.
It is an upside-down argument, since it would be discrimination if the right was abused to limit the freedom of religion and conscience of religious doctors and nurses.
On the surface, this is a small victory, but in terms of its consequences, it is a huge step forward.
Indeed, Anglo-Saxon law - in contrast to, for example, Hungarian jurisprudence - is based on precedent law, so in the future, defenders of life may win similar victories by referring to this case.
