Now what? Because it's hard to understand this, especially for people with little sense like me. Because there are these expensive drag queens and others like them who want nothing more than to protect their rights. Take away our rights.
Because they are so cute. They are beautiful, any photo taken of them (or their parades) is proof of that. The highest degree of aesthetics is the sight of uncles with hairy legs, beards, stretching in women's clothes, right? But don't judge based on the sight, let the intentions and actions speak.
What is there to reject if these symptomatic people want to make our children and grandchildren smarter?
They are driven only by pure good will. They take over the embarrassing task of providing sexual education from their parents, aren't they nice? Isn't that a great relief? So much so that they would not even allow us to disturb the innocent children's souls with our delusions (there are only two genders, marriage is the union of a man and a woman, men cannot menstruate or give birth, and similar unnatural nonsense).
What is it that there are only two genders? Of course, in the delivery room, they force this on the newly born little one, abusing the fact that he is not yet able to protest.
And yet, perhaps from the very first moment, the consciousness of a snail, a dog, or a three-gender future human is hidden in him.
You just have to fulfill it, and this is what the benevolent drag queens undertake. If I could, I would take the forward-looking step of banning parents from delivery rooms. But this is still the music of the future.
What is it that men can't give birth? An EU decision states that they can do it, so anyone who opposes it is anti-European, an obstacle to progress, a pariah worthy of contempt and even persecution.
There are small problems though. It is also suggested in the movie Life of Brian (sinisterly, that movie should be banned immediately in the name of democracy) that a man has a hard time carrying a fetus out, at most in a pouch, which may not be the real thing. But the film also has positive messages when it is decided (by democratic vote!!!) that even if it is impossible for the male gender to give birth, but above all, he still has the right to do so! This is correct.
The law before everything, the law above reality!
Let there be no doubt, the vanguards of LGBTQ and God knows what other letters are dear, friendly, peaceful people. Their parades - which, I admit, I don't know why they are necessary, the dog doesn't care which one is a dog and which one is the owner, or what happens in their bedroom and with whom - so their parades are imbued with love, radiating warmth.
Those who claim that their attempts to hinder children's healthy development do not actually exist may be right.
They just want to expose the stupidity to the innocent little ones. Preferably also for the seniors, because they are very interested in the topic.
If not, it can only be because their backward parents block them from the overwhelming perspective of otherness. It's good for the parents anyway, don't interfere in their child's upbringing! Because they were born, raised and cared for, they have not yet been given the right to decide what is good for them instead of drags and queens.
But they don't want to implement this intention, driven by love, by force, oh no! On the other hand, they were open and straightforward people, who also chanted sincerely at the New York pride parade:
We are coming for your children!
They must have thought that if there was no babysitter, then they would help the family. It can only be about that, because they don't threaten and don't want to be violent, of course.
Nor was the LGBTQ activist who bravely hit the leader of the CittizenGo group, who was peacefully demonstrating with signs in front of Disneyland and protesting the Pride nights organized for children, from behind. He didn't want to hurt anyone, I think he hit a mosquito on the neck of the protester against the aggressive rainbow push. He wanted to prevent that big mosquito from sucking the protester's blood. Nothing to see here! (By the way, a sight to see. You can see the video of the affair below.)
We are lucky that we have an authentic, democratic, truly European opposition, who see the situation clearly. Those who believe that LGBTQ rights should be protected, even though no one attacks them. Of course, if the rights include freely corrupting children in schools and even kindergartens.
However, it is more than doubtful whether the prohibition of aberration education can be understood as an attack on trans people and other freaks. On the contrary, i.e. an attack on parental rights...
Let's remember how much the opposition mercenary army who knew better cursed and mocked when the parliamentary majority made it part of the basic law that marriage is an official relationship between a man and a woman, and that there are no two genders. How foolish is it to raise these facts to the constitutional level? Who are the bullies who say otherwise? Well, who are they????
István Örkény has a short article, the title of which is "People long for warmth". But the author thought about the warmth of the tiles of the thermocoke stove, and he didn't just think about it, he wrote about it. It is interesting that there is no other kind of warmth in the novella. Of course, the problem can be easily remedied. If traditional fairy tales can be heated up, why not do the same with Örkény's writing?
Author: György Tóth Jr
Cover photo: KATHY WILLENS, AP
