A few days ago, the European Parliament voted on a new law, according to which fact-finding journalists, rights-defending NGOs, NGOs, and activists can be exempted from all legal liability if they plead in court that their participation in public life is violated.

There is an established principle, equality before the law. There is a left-wing principle, according to which equality is above all else. If you are not willing to call a man who thinks he is a woman by his male name, you violate this equality above all else. If you stand out with your performance and wealth, you still offend.

The basic principle and mania of progression is "real" equality, in as many areas as possible, beyond formal equality.

In English, this is not called "equality" (formal equality), but "equity". Freedom of speech and freedom of religion are persecuted in the name of this real equality, because they only serve to cover up discriminatory practices, and what's more, they provide a platform for them - says the progressive argument.

According to them, the world is full of unjustified privilege, privileged whites, straights, men, Christians (?), capitalists, and so on. If there is a hierarchy of privilege, so does oppression, non-whites (except Asians), non-heteros, women, Muslims, but most of all black Muslim transwomen are oppressed. This is called intersectionality : when the supposed privileges you enjoy or the supposed disadvantages you suffer are projected onto each other. The purpose of any slightly dicey approach is to take away privileges and eliminate disadvantages.

This is where the European Parliament comes in and passes a bill , according to which

fact-finding journalists, rights-defending NGOs, NGOs, and activists can be exempted from any legal liability if they plead in court that their participation in public life is violated.

In any case, starting from this idea, the European Parliament came up with the idea that it wants to exempt activists, NGOs, and journalists from being sued, practically on a self-declaration basis. The far-left EP would thus serve several purposes: it would place its own propaganda army and political hinterland above the law, as well as take a big step towards the European superstate and weaken the member states.

Let there be no doubt, after that the Soros and other NGOs and others will follow

they could more freely try to break the "closed societies" and they could not even be sued.

It seems that extreme equality means what George Orwell wrote in Animal Farm: everyone is equal, but there are more equal. These are more equal, since they work for equalization and liberation, they are endowed with privileges so that they can do their work more freely - and of course also as a reward. They are the enlightened intellectuals, they are the revolutionary vanguard, their painstaking work pays off so much that they cannot be sued. The EP, it seems, really represents a new version of communism instead of the people.

The concept is not new and the concept is not European.

This approach first appeared in the United States in the 1980s, but with a completely different content. There was no mention of the need to establish the illegality of NGOs, rather they wanted to describe the case when someone abuses the possibility of filing a lawsuit and hangs a bunch of lawsuits on someone's neck out of malice. The representatives of the European left twisted this concept, thus the lawsuits against civil organizations and activists became a separate category, where

they are effectively saying that the right of NGOs to participate in public life is stronger than the right of any member of society to sue them.

This is a gross violation of the rule of law, since it is a basic principle that everyone is equal before the law - Ernő Schaller-Baross, Fidesz EP representative, told Mandiner .

Source: Mandarin

Photo: Pixabay