The WHO - the health organization of the UN - led by Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, an Ethiopian Marxist-Communist, is preparing to adopt an agreement with the 194 member states - i.e. the whole world - at their General Assembly next year, which will give the WHO comprehensive and complete control over the nation-states in cases of epidemics and pandemics. 

I have written about this several times before, but it is not possible to talk and write about it enough, because I see that the news related to it is a bit overshadowed in the official media - unfortunately also in our country.

Just as we didn't hear much - unfortunately - about the fact that a WHO conference recently took place in our country, in which Hungarian healthcare leaders also participated. In fact, a Budapest Declaration was also adopted at this meeting.

Never mind, let's get to the point.

Within the framework of the World Health Organization (WHO), two agreements are already in full swing, namely the amendment of the Pandemic Treaty and the International Health Regulations (IHR). These amendments would be submitted to the 2024 general assembly, which would nod to them according to their plans.

The only small problem is that these "modifications" would practically fundamentally change our lives - not only ours, but the whole world. In a rather ominous way, to put it mildly.

What you can know about this is that, based on the pandemic treaty and the amendments to the IHR, the World Health Organization, the WHO, would practically become a world health government as a supranational and global superorganization. Based on the drafts, the WHO would perform the following tasks:

Early detection and prevention of pandemics - for which a global early warning and monitoring system is being established.

The WHO would no longer be anything other than the coordinating authority for global health issues, which would effectively deprive national and local health authorities of the possibility of independent decisions, and thus fundamentally contradict the principle of national sovereignty and independence.

Another goal is to strengthen international cooperation in areas such as surveillance, alerts and response, which would be equivalent to the creation by states of a global citizen surveillance system enforced by the WHO, and the fight against "disinformation" worldwide, which would essentially be equivalent with the introduction of censorship.

It's luck and good news - which we also know nothing about - that at the end of June in Cologne, a group of lawyers from ten countries held a meeting and most strongly stood against the introduction of the above WHO amendments.

Anwalte für Aufklärung rejects both the Pandemic Treaty and the IHR as goals that go against the rule of law, human liberties, the principle of subsidiarity and the sovereignty of nation states.

The ten participating countries are Austria, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, France, Spain, Italy, the Czech Republic, the Netherlands, Israel and Germany.

They state clearly: they say no to totalitarianism and they say no to world governance , more precisely to its first, stealthy step.

I also want to be clear: they are, were and will be right.

If the WHO, with a retired terrorist at the helm, really wants to achieve such goals by 2024, we have no other option than to leave the WHO, which is primarily financed by Big Pharma, private companies and Bill Gates.

Is our sovereignty important to us? Yes!

And certainly not only against the WHO...

Source: Hungarian Nation

Cover image: Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Ethiopian Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO)
MTI/EPA/Keystone/Salvatore Di Nolfi