During our last conversation, with the help of political scientist Zoltán Kiszelly, we tried to find an answer to why the Germans seem to have lost their minds. Now let's see why the same thing happens with leading politicians.
We have reached a point that no one would have ever believed: an elected politician, who is also the foreign minister, could declare that he does not care about the opinion of his constituents, he will do what he likes even if the majority opposes it. Madness!
This was announced by Annalena Baerbock, who is the former female co-chair of the Green Party and the current German foreign minister. But there is also the Green Party Minister of Economy and Climate Protection, Robert Habeck, who was also co-chairman of the Greens. Well, they are clearly globalists. This is what they were raised to do. In a subtle, unspectacular way, though
the globalists select those young people who will be expected to put their principles into practice.
An example of this is the Forum of Young Global Leaders, a youth club whose members are noticed at a young age, highlighted, given scholarships, invited to important events, get to know each other and gain international contacts. They are there at many important forums, for example at the meetings of the Bilderberg group, or in Davos, that is, the globalists create and train their own supply. And when such a politician comes to power, he implements globalist politics. By the way, we are seeing this now in connection with Ukraine.
The German political elite, the German politicians, are not very interested in what people think.
It is enough to think of, say, Konrad Adenauer, who rearmed Germany after the lost war, which the Germans did not want. But they also didn't want NATO membership, or what Helmut Schmidt did when he let nuclear missiles into Germany. There were huge demonstrations against this, hundreds of thousands and millions of demonstrations in West Germany. Helmut Kohl also gave up the German mark despite the opposition of the Germans, because this was the price of German unity, which the French and the Americans demanded of him. The Germans did not want to give up the German brand either. Angela Merkel was no different from this, who, despite German opposition, did not kick Greece out of the euro zone, because she said that if the common currency fails, the European Union will fail. That is
there are a lot of things that the Germans don't want, because they instinctively or based on common sense see that it will be bad for them, but the German elite want to preserve the European Union - which is also an elite project - or the German-American cooperation , he is willing to sacrifice a lot, of course for the sake of the average German people.
They are doing this even now with the support of Ukraine, economic separation from Russia, or soon from China. Politicians are only executors, we can also say that they are disposable politicians, they make their decisions, which will obviously cause them to fail in the next election, but their decision remains the same. This would also have been the case with Péter Márki-Zay and his rainbow coalition. The rolling dollars would have helped him to power, and then he would have made decisions that are good for the globalist elites, but not good for the Hungarian people. And even if they failed, the consequences of their decisions would remain.
Here, the global elite did not manage to achieve this, but it seems that the Germans did it without a mistake, or let's be somewhat permissive, with minor mistakes, but it works.
It can work because German people are trained to obey.
Farancis Fukuyama wrote very well in his book State Building, which can also be read in Hungarian, that when the Americans realized in 1943 that they would win, they developed a strategy valid for enemy countries. What can be summed up is that in Japan they left the emperor, in Italy they left the chaos, the Germans were given new rules and the Germans still operate according to the new rules. They accept what they are told, they don't question it, or they just grumble quietly and secretly at home.
They don't even let you question anything.
Here we go
to the LGBTQ ideology, which I think is a totalitarian ideology. It has exactly the same function as other totalitarian ideologies. It controls people and forces them to cooperate formally.
To make it easy to understand: in Hungary, after 1948, anyone who did not greet them with "Freedom, comrades!", was already suspect. And those who greeted him with good morning or God bless him were called outright reactionaries. This is precisely the role of the rainbow ideology, the gender ideology. For example, anyone who does not use both the feminine and masculine genders in Western languages is suspicious from the start. It is better understood if I give an example: on such a basis, I should say, dear readers, women and dear readers, men.
A kind of linguistic control works, but also a symbolic control.
The company or the house that does not display the rainbow flag during Pride month (July) immediately becomes suspect. By the way, we saw this with the Nazis and Communists as well, that anyone who did not cooperate, did not formally identify with the system's expectations, did not greet them with "Freedom, comrades!" or "Heil Hitler!", they immediately became suspicious. Now anyone who doesn't display the Ukrainian flag on their social media profile or the rainbow flag on their store or office during Pride month is just as suspicious. With this, they can control society, and those who do not formally identify with these values are already suspicious and can be pushed out. There is also a diabolical logic to this, because if many people accept this linguistic genderism, if they use the new language forms, those who do not use it can easily think that since the majority uses it, the majority must be right. He believes that the right thing to do is to adapt to the "zeitgeist". So gender ideology, like climate ideology before, has the role of basic social control. Anyone who rebels against this, or who does not use it, can already be excluded from social media, and those stigmas that normal people do not want to identify with can be baked on them. This is how they can suppress critical voices.
However, they are not only trying to make criticism of gender ideology impossible, but also all kinds of social criticism. Which, of course, is not a surprising attempt given the rapid decline in living standards experienced in the "West".
Last time I gave an example with the 20s, well, here is a parallel again. In Western European societies, mainly German, but I can also say French, we are now at a point where, while in the last say 10 years mainly the small existences have slipped, say those with an income of one thousand five hundred to two thousand euros, now the same is happening to those with two thousand five hundred to three thousand euros also among searchers. Life in the big cities has suddenly become very expensive, for example in Munich, the monthly wage for a 30 square meter apartment is around €1,000, so people belonging to the already mentioned lower middle class have no chance of being able to pay it. Moreover, it is not even possible to live normally in a big city on two thousand to two thousand five hundred euros. That is why the average German worker wants a salary increase of 500-600 euros per month, so not 5-6%. Increase your salary by five hundred to six hundred euros per month to two thousand five hundred to three thousand, and increase this amount by another 6-8% to offset inflation.
The middle class can no longer live according to its previous life strategy in the big cities,
because migrants want to go there, rural Germans from Germany also want to go there, because they can earn better there, life is better, thirdly, guest workers from Eastern Europe also want to go to German cities. Therefore, the population is growing faster than the supply of housing, which also drives up prices, plus a lot of other factors, such as the energy revolution. From this point of view, we are now at the point where the stable part of the middle class, which up until now supported the system and voted for the moderate parties, can no longer make a living and they do not see a promising perspective either. They don't say, as in the case of covid, that "you get two vaccines and then you'll be fine", but everything is uncertain. The Ukrainian war is here, we don't know when it will end. As a result of the so-called energy revolution, it will only get worse until 2030 or '35, from that point of view
the crises of the twenties seem to be returning.
After the hyperinflation of the 1920s or the stock market crash of the 1920s, the upper part of the middle class also ceased to exist or began to decline. We are now at the point where the stable part of the German middle class is starting to slip, and with them the circle of small and medium-sized entrepreneurs that form the basis of the German economy. If the middle class has no money and cannot consume, then the small and medium-sized companies built on it, especially the local economy, suffer from this.
Perhaps this also plays a role in the fact that the AfD, which was pushed to the periphery for a long time, has become significantly stronger.
People are looking for a political alternative. The AfD is actually gaining strength as a protest, like the Nazi Party or the Communist Party of the time in the 1920s. Then the two extremes became equally strong, at one time the Nazis more, then the communists. This was also the reason why the Germans allowed Hitler to come to power. They began to become disillusioned with the Nazis, who only made noise but could not bring about change, so in 1932 they began to become disillusioned with the eternal opposition Hitler. The German elite was afraid that the people would turn to the communists, which would lead to nationalization and the Soviet system, so they said that Hitler was better than the communists. We are only now at the point where the Germans would vote for the AfD as a sign of their displeasure, but two-thirds of the voters do not know what program the AfD represents and the far-right party really only receives protest votes. What does the German elite do about this? It does not change the policy, but they want to ban the AfD, just as they want to make Donald Trump impossible by bringing him to court, thus preventing his presidential candidacy.
Author: György Tóth Jr
Cover photo: Facebook
This is how Germany shoots itself in the foot - interview with Zoltán Kiszelly
