Recently, with the help of political scientist Zoltán Kiszelly, we researched why the German middle class turned to the extremist AfD instead of traditional parties, and how the German elite wants to prevent the success of this party. Not with traditional democratic means, but with a ban, just as they are trying to prevent the resumption of the former American president by dragging him to court.
These methods somehow do not seem very democratic. Knowing the situation, one suspects that this is a global conspiracy. Also about political export, a small but spectacular manifestation of which was the rampage of the terrorist organization called Antifa in Budapest. Just as the Nazis had stormtroopers, so do the globalists, it seems.
We know that there are no conspiracy theories, only conspiracies, we have said and described this many times, so we cannot be surprised at the current situation in Europe. This was roughly what the politics of the 1920s were all about. There was and is a world power, the USA, and it always has a challenger. In the twenties they competed with the English, now the Chinese are seen as a challenger. At that time they wanted to team up with the Germans against the British, now we see that they are trying to use the European Union against the Chinese by wanting to open up the American and EU markets.
The USA now has an annual GDP of twenty-three thousand billion dollars, the European Union has a total of seventeen thousand billion, that's forty thousand billion dollars. If we open up these two markets, a kind of free trade zone would be created, supplemented by Canada, Mexico, Japan, South Korea, Australia, that is, roughly 40 countries would open their markets, the financial superiority of the block led by the USA would be significant. If we compare only the US's 23 billion with China's roughly fifteen thousand billion dollars, it can be seen that China would catch up with the US sooner or later. If, on the other hand, we examine the balance of power together with the EU, the other countries would be forced to make a choice. There would be a core of gravity, a forty thousand billion dollar market, India, South Africa, and Saudi Arabia would have to decide whether they want to do business with the forty thousand billion or the fifteen thousand billion.
This is the big plan, you don't need special training to see that they want to build such a mass of gravity in the economic, political, military, technological sense that the rest of the world simply cannot help but choose this.
I don't quite understand the technological separation.
This would mean green hydrogen in the West. In the East, in China and India, a coal-based economy. They would not say that we do not allow Chinese products, but that we do not allow products produced with energy obtained from coal.
It is known that these will be Chinese products, but it is not necessary to say so.
Or, for example, Huawei should be removed from the 5G system because if they develop their own operating systems - which the Chinese have already done, this is the third big one next to Android and IOS, it's called Harmony - they don't say that we're banning it because it's Chinese , but that it is dangerous for viruses, suspicious of espionage, bad.
We saw the same thing with covid vaccines, Pfizer is "good", Sinopharm vaccine is "bad".
Based on the examples, the intention of technological separation is perhaps more understandable. The German elite chooses the Americans because the Germans respect the Russians, but they are not afraid of them.
They also respect the Americans, but they are also afraid of them, because America defeated Germany twice, not the Russians, not the Soviet Union. Without American help, the Soviet Union could not have defeated Germany.
The Soviets received "only" 23,000 tanks from across the sea, but kerosene, canned beef, everything came from there. The bottom line is that the German elite is with America, at least that's what they've decided now, and that's why they're implementing what the USA wants.
I have already mentioned it and I will repeat it, it seems that the German elite, the globalists, also operate an assault team. It's just that it's not exactly clear why they need the Antifas, given what has been said?
As for the Antifas, this is also part of the idea of the West German state. In 1945, they broke with the past and started with a clean slate, at least that was the narrative and to a large extent this happened. No in person, but obviously yes in politics. The West German state believed that if the neo-Nazis demonstrated, then at least the same number of counter-protesters should take to the streets. If you are interested, you can read my related article on the Mozgástér blog , which also talked about phenomena related to the demonstrations of the Pegida movement.
The anti-immigration demonstrations were not attended by Nazis, but by concerned citizens, but political foundations supporting immigration organized counter-demonstrations through the mediation of trade unions. With paid counter-protesters!
The so-called counter-protesters were paid 20-50 euros per hour so that they were not only anti-immigration on the street. That is, if there is no spontaneous counter-protest, the extras were paid. There was a particularly cold February when they couldn't find enough counter-protesters even for 50 euros, so they asked the authorities to ban the anti-immigration demonstration, because they had tens of thousands of people there every Monday. The same applies to the commemoration of the day of the eruption. This is an event that has become known throughout Europe and takes place every February in Budapest.
Since there are not many counter-demonstrations in Hungary, counter-demonstrators were imported here. Unfortunately, violence characterized German politics even in the 1920s.
Of course, this globalist free team is deployed not only here and in Germany, but everywhere where anti-globalist movements "threaten". True, they work at home with the greatest "diligence". One of their cruelest groups, the Hammerband, even dared to break into the home of a conservative representative in Jena and break his leg into splinters.
They send these brutal groups all over Europe, as I said, so that people don't see in the media of that country that there are thousands of people protesting on one side and no one on the other side. That is why they appeared in Budapest, and the Hungarian police did well not to extradite the perpetrators of the brutal street attacks to Germany, because they would have been at large there a long time ago, and that does not deter, but only encourages, the perpetrators. Even so, they allow themselves almost everything. In Bavaria and Hesse, for example, there will be two elections on October 8, and the Antifas there are already publishing the list of AfD candidates with names, addresses, and phone numbers, as if calling on them to attack these candidates. But in other provinces, they even went as far as taking action against right-wing, bourgeois or conservative politicians.
So political violence was and still is present in Germany and through "export" also in other countries, so I can only say that God brought us in the 1920s.
While the German and Hungarian economies are connected by extremely close ties and these relations are still excellent today, at the same time there is a centrally directed hate campaign against Hungary by the politicians, for example in the German press. On one side the situation is positive, on the other side it is absolutely negative. I just can't understand that logic.
Let's start with the fact that Angela Merkel was very adept at using Hungarian political alternatives for her own purposes. His successor, Olaf Scholz, is far less talented in this regard. Merkel learned a lot from Helmut Kohl and Scholz did not acquire this knowledge. Let's see how Merkel "used" Hungary for her political maneuvers. We go our own way, we discuss the issues before us with referendums and national consultations. When we held a referendum on migration or gender madness, or organized a national consultation on closures or openings during covid, then everyone could express their opinion for and against. Even those on the left who did not fill in the form took part in the consultation, because, willy-nilly, they were also debating the topic raised by the government.
So we discussed the alternatives well, everything was on the table, and the majority decided. This is democracy, and perhaps that is why there were no demonstrations in Hungary.
In the last 13 years, we really talked about everything. In Germany, there is no referendum or national consultation, the elites decide there. Merkel took advantage of this by presenting the Hungarian position as one of the extreme ones, and even seemingly accepting it. This is what the Hungarians want, so let it be. He also found the right politician to represent the other extreme, this was Jean-Claude Juncker, who represents the "open gates" policy on immigration. The restriction of immigration and the preservation of Christian Europe were thus represented by Viktor Orbán, and on the opposite side by Juncker, thus Merkel was immediately put in the position of mediator.
In Hungarian, he seemed moderate, because he was able to mediate on both sides, thereby becoming Germany's kingmaker.
In important European issues, Hungary offers a democratic and market economy alternative, i.e. within the Western system, which the Germans have so far used very well to see who is with the Hungarians, and when this became clear, they were able to isolate the other countries from us right away. With promises and threats. This was a method that worked very well, now the problem is that Scholz does not use this method, so very often they end up in an extreme position, which is not good for Germany.
At the same time, it's also a problem that they don't have any good offers for us or the others. They say that migrants should be taken in or nuclear power plants should be closed, but these are not good proposals either at the level of the people or at the level of the national economy.
This is the main problem in Hungarian-German relations, that there is no good, win-win, i.e. win-win offer, German politics now represents the other extreme, spiced up with the already mentioned Antifa or gender ideology. Today, Germany does not mediate, but confronts, whereas before, say, the Dutch Mark Rutte or others were there, Viktor Orbán was there against them, and the Germans made compromises. In today's European and German politics, this no longer works.
