This man has been in the pay of the American left for a decade and a half and has been working against the Hungarian right with various methods. Today, he does all this much more cunningly, but he remains the same communist from abroad as he was and his goals are the same as before.

Márton Gulyás, the founder of Partizán, spoke in a Swedish educational video that surfaced a few weeks ago about how the Orbán governments had reduced democracy since 2010. But he also said that even though it seems that there is democracy in Hungary, since there are elections, a repressive, autocratic regime still rules. In addition to him, black belt Soros agents such as Guy Verhofstadt and Judith Sargentini speak in the video.

With Márton Gulyás, the Swedish children are being teased against Hungary

After the scandal surrounding the video, Gulyás said:

"I can accept what I said in that statement to this day, there are many arguments in favor of how much better the quality of Hungarian democracy was in 2010 compared to the second half of the 2010s. Today we are writing 2023 and the situation has only gotten worse."

In other words, according to him, the eye-popping, swordplay, giga-corruption around metro number 4, public wealth squandered abroad for pennies, which characterized the Gyurcsány-Bajnai era, showed a much more prosperous democracy than now.

Why were we surprised by these statements? Would we be so forgetful? Why did we even think that Márton Gulyás was in the middle, that he had now become an independent-objective, well-groomed reporter? Is it because you have already put left-liberal people in a difficult situation with your questions? Or because right-wing people have also been on his show? Couldn't it be a coincidence that he beat everyone like that?

Because he works with other methods, he remains as communist as when he threw paint at the Sándor Palace. It's just more sophisticated towards its goal.

From Origo's summary, we know that Gulyás made his living as a Krétakörös actor, with Soros money and the Open Society's $125,000 support. From 2012, he emerged as the leader of the wave of protests incited by the Student Network. The latter demonstrations also revealed that the American trainers from the Soros network, through the Civil College Foundation, taught the leaders of the demonstration how to effectively exert pressure and create a revolution. These processes have been carried out successfully in several places in our neighbors, and we should not underestimate these methods just because we have not yet succeeded. Some examples: Ukraine, Macedonia, Georgia, Moldova.

After the fall of HaHás, the communist activist drew attention to himself with various provocations. In August 2015, he disrupted the exhibition of the Hungarian pavilion at the Venice Biennale.

The Gulyás also protested aggressively against the Hungarian government's construction of a fence, and the Italian police had to intervene. And in 2017, he poured paint over the Sándor Palace, for which he was sentenced to 300 hours of community service. It was at this time that he started to start Slejm's YouTube channel, which later turned out to be financed by the Soros-funded Közös Ország Alápítvány through the Alternative Community Association.

Behind Partizán, he himself admitted that "György Soros is also at the end of the line". I won't even begin to list.

Well, after such antecedents, to think that Marci Gulyás has changed, that Marci Gulyás is no longer a communist, that Marci Gulyás is no longer a Soros agent, is more than naive.

Márton Gulyás is a continuously trained Soros agent.

Who is now much more refined than he was five years ago. He realized that he could elicit the sympathy of society much better with more restrained methods, sitting in front of the camera in a nice studio, than with aggressive, violent means.

In fact, Gulyás and the professional trainers behind him were even smarter than that. They realized that Hungarian society will only really accept Marci if he invites right-wing interlocutors and conducts relatively fair conversations with them. In other words, the right wing legitimizes the former paint thrower's hosting activities.

The case of the Swedish video and Gulyás's reaction clearly show that neither he nor his goals have changed. His goal is equally to replace the Orbán government, to help the left-wing, which he considers appropriate, to power and to serve the interests of his employers to the maximum. Only now he does it even more cunningly than years ago. This is not why it is worth legitimizing your activity.

Pest Boys