In contrast to the PC dictatorship in the West, it is indeed possible to criticize the gender ideology that has become a state religion in the West and the church that spreads it, the Soros organizations, the Center for Fundamental Rights announced.
The Labrisz Egyesület sued the Hungarian Nation in every legal forum because the paper criticized the storybook Meseorzág észkyés.
"Labrisz started a lawsuit because of the propaganda book Meseorzág tejác écó. In the case that reached the Constitutional Court, the body stated: freedom of speech includes criticism of ideas. From there, Labrisz can slander as they wish: anyone has the right to criticize their propaganda, and children can and must be protected from the harmful effects of the gender ideology they spread," the Center for Fundamental Rights announced on Thursday.
The precedent of the case is that the Constitutional Court, in its decision on Wednesday, rejected the constitutional complaint of the Labrisz Association, which requested the annulment of the Court's previous judgment (decided on the violation of the right to privacy).
The case went through the Tribunal, the Sentencing Panel, and then the Court, but "Labrisz ran with his complaints to the Constitutional Court", as the Center for Fundamental Rights puts it.
The Constitutional Court had to examine the relationship between freedom of expression and the protection of reputation.
The AB stated that the contested communication did not contain a statement of fact, but a value judgment, and pointed out in its decision that "a distinction must be made between criticism and critique of ideas, intellectual products, and persons", because "all ideas can be freely criticized".
The case also clearly shows that there is a need to create cultural sovereignty and identity protection that protects Hungary and Hungarian identity: we must avoid that, like Westerners, fashion tells us who we are, emphasized the Center for Fundamental Rights .
"In any case, the catalog of values of the Basic Law stands on the ground of strong child protection, which is also meant to protect young people against contagious gender propaganda, because it states absolutely clearly: this ideology and the organization and publication representing it cannot be allowed near children. Therefore, the Constitutional Court should not shy away from emphasizing this either," concludes the statement of the Center for Fundamental Rights.
