Even if they are not in the pantry, those who are the enemies of the Christian-conservative thought are there in our lives. Not primarily among ordinary foreign and domestic citizens, but clearly visible and palpable among left-liberal politicians and their slave organizations.
- There are forces at home and abroad that must be dealt with, but there are also forces - such as Átlátzó, who regularly attacks CÖF-CÖKA with false accusations - that are almost worthless. Nevertheless, the civil society reacts to these genderless attacks. Why? After all, they are insignificant, so it is not worth dealing with them.
- We could really win - says László Csizmadia, the founding president of CÖF-CÖKA - that we do not do this, because if we forget about the necessary countermeasures, we are sinning against ourselves and our families. Of course, the hardest counterattack is the election, where we can show where the majority is. If democracy lives somewhere, if there is a rule of law - and in Europe it exists to a large extent, it is another question how it can be manipulated - but if it works, then at those times when the people can exercise their identity, when they can speak individually with their vote, then this opportunity should not be missed. And especially if the recent past, even the more distant past confirms it, it should not be neglected, it is not allowed to send representatives either to the European Union or to the Hungarian municipalities who run for elections only to create a good life for themselves. We see this with some of the EU representatives, with their five million monthly salary and their own egos, they turn their backs on the voters who trusted them and expected them to represent them out there.
- And inside, i.e. in Hungary as well.
"Of course." But what do we see? Let's take the example of Budapest. When the left was in power, Hungary went bankrupt, now the capital is bankrupt and, in fact, the European Union is also bankrupt, in economic bankruptcy, because our tax forints are not spent on what they should be, and moreover, by taking out huge loans, they are trying to support a certain idealism without having a consensus could be formed that comes directly from the lips of the people. To represent me, my family, my country and to be able to reach a consensus if necessary. However, Hungarian left-liberal representatives are not like that. We, civilians, and the CÖF have a huge role to play in this, we must draw attention to the fact that such situations can happen every four or five years, when the majority people can determine their own destiny. You have to go to vote, you have to cast your vote, you have to evaluate with your own eyes, with your own soul, with the situation of your family, what is good and what is bad. The parties can be forgotten, the only question is what is good and what is bad? You don't have to think much about this now, because the answer is simple. War is bad, peace is good. The real problem is that the vast majority of governments forget to ask those who entrusted them with their trust about the fate of the people. These governments, leaders and representatives with party interests then come up with various sick ideas. Maybe they bought them by the pound, or they simply think that they already live well, it would only be problematic if they represented their country, asked their own people, and tried to convey what the majority says.
"It's not enough that they don't represent anyone but themselves, and they also want to influence human consciousness."
"That wouldn't be a problem, but the question is, in what direction and who influences it?" If it is about patriotism, love of family, love of Europe, love of the world, love of world peace, then this influence is correct. But if we approach the situation by listening to, say, Átlátszó, or other Soros and other foreign-funded organizations and NGOs, who preach the exact opposite, then we can safely say that the country's sovereignty is in danger. With skillful maneuvering and actions, a government elected by the majority can be replaced, discrediting actions can be created, and a "private investigation" set up as an investigation, but with a one-way political motive, can be conducted. Attacking certain people, agitating against them, for example, by saying that they are vacationing "on the people's money", when they are just relaxing on the beach with their families, just like anyone else. They integrate into a group, and then try to make it seem as if they are doing something criminal, secret, about which their "investigator pulls the cover off". All this, of course, on the basis of an external commission, with foreign money - because they do not receive support for this at home - and everyone knows: whoever pays, orders. Is this the investigation? By no means, they are trying to show strength and bring down a specific idea, fortunately with very little success. This is why the creation of the Sovereignty Protection Office, for example, is very important, because the actions of NGOs or individual people that are funded by foreign funds or commissions can often raise national security issues. And when an organization even describes that it shares the acquired information on an international basis, and boasts about it on its website, then you have to think about who you share it with, why you share it, and now I'm going to say ugly, how much do you share it for?
- NGOs that do not operate for the sake of gaining power, but want to help their fellow human beings in some area, should and will be accepted without further ado. However, we do not accept criticism from those who do not do this spectacularly. If they stand up like the CÖF, that we have a 15-year-old set of ideals, our own identity, and when we were in opposition, we followed the same as we follow today, then they can speak out. We do not give support to Fidesz, but to the ideology we call: Christianity, nation, family.
You can watch the video interview here:
Photo: civilek.info
