Politicians who "reinterpret reality" can only turn yellow with envy when they see what the film industry is doing.
We could say that the falsification of history is as old as history itself. You don't necessarily need to be an expert to see the signs of this. It is enough, for example, if someone takes out a Slovakian history book used in the eighties of the last century and looks at the section on the time of the conquest. Or for those who don't want to go back in time, it's enough to compare, for example, the current "findings of fact" of some EU politicians with those made a few years ago. Yes, sometimes the effort is truly heart-warming, as the reader-voter can witness in this regard, reality often overrides the world of Orwell's 1984.
But in recent years, politicians who "re-explain reality" can only turn yellow with envy when they see what the film industry is doing. And now it seems that certain members of the "historical profession" do not hesitate to join.
Another victim of the falsification of history is Charlotte, Queen of Britain, III. Several news sources, including zerohedge.com, reported on György's wife, whom not only the Netflix streaming channel, which is famous for its alternative history interpretation, but also a British museum is trying to present as a queen of color.
The Queens House museum in Greenwich, which receives public funding as part of the British Royal Museums, claims in the audio guide of its current exhibition about the German-born later British queen that the person of color, mixed race, was "the first black queen". Of course, the unfoundedness of the claim does not require any special proof, since it should be clear to anyone who did not get their "historical knowledge" from the Netflix series, even without examining contemporary paintings, that not only was she born as Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz later queen, but was not "characteristic" of any other family of the German nobility of the 18th century, the African marriage.
And even then we used a very PC (politically correct) wording, without detailing what the general European attitude towards other (meaning non-European) races was in those historical times.
After this, it should not be surprising that the audio guide of the said British museum "explains" the striking difference between their claim and the historical reality by saying that the "white historians" forgot to describe this fact because at that time "systemic racism was characteristic .” Well, it really boggles the mind.
It doesn't take much insight to realize that the fact that the "works" of the consumer film industry, which targets a wide range of people, has come to the screens in recent years - mainly those set in European historical times - has inevitably overrepresented non-European actors in roles where they are clearly strangers to the situation, it can't be a coincidence.
And from here it is only one step to assume that this kind of falsification of history is purposeful and in the context of illegal immigration follows the acceptance of the lie that the population of the old continent has always been as mixed as, for example, London's is now.
Featured Image: Liam Daniel/Netflix
