I refrained from dealing with this vile mental patient, and with the sick Komcsi-Libsi fist-shaking, with which they are clearly trying to make the Catholic Church impossible. But be that as it may, the latest performance of the fool from Belpes awakened the sleeping lion in me.
Until now, I only thought of this careerist who terrorized women, lied to everyone, and was a real nobody, but the situation is worse, much worse. This is a microLenin, a raging idiot, a Bolshevik cut from a stem. He had the nerve to scream loudly during the Mass, to disturb the devotion of the faithful, to shout accusations that nothing in the world proves, but the tone he used undoubtedly painted a picture of Pyotr Vengersky as a hysterical madman. The self-proclaimed messiah ran amok in Putnok, insulting those leaving the church.
But Vladimir Ilyich would be happy to hear this idiot!
However, it is reassuring that there is more of it. For example, those who, in the debate on the tightening of the child protection law, demanded that the secret of confession should not remain a secret either. Any priest who learns about a suspected pedophile case during the holy confession and does not report it should go to prison.
I don't know if the ladies and gentlemen of the least respect know the meaning of the word secret?
Hardly, since even the discussions that are meant to be secret between each other are recorded (secretly, yes) and leaked. For them, a secret is only a secret as long as it is in their interest to keep it. Or to use it for blackmail, as Pyotr Vengersky did with his wife, Judit Varga.
I know this is not easy to understand for someone who doesn't want to, but
during the holy confession, not only does the sinner confess his sins and therefore the confessor imposes penance (satisfaction), but at the same time the priest also takes upon himself the sins of the sinner.
That is, he is forced to carry a terrible mental burden if he becomes aware of such a case. Of course, those who have never had a conscience don't care at all.
But there is something else here. Why should only priests violate their duty of confidentiality? What about doctors, who are also bound by medical confidentiality? Or what about lawyers who often defend murderers? Their clients also "confess", that is, the lawyer most of the time knows that his client, say, committed murder, but there is no proof of this. Should he give up his client too?
The counterargument is that the doctor and the lawyer are only doing their job. Why, perhaps not the priest? His "job description" also includes the duty of confidentiality, with the difference that his "employer" is a little more powerful than the medical or bar associations.
Therefore, whoever wants to take away the sanctity of the secret of confession from the priest is like forbidding a doctor to heal, and requiring a lawyer to only defend the innocent.
Or like the wildest Bolsheviks. They are unbelievers who secretly envy others for having faith and therefore want to deprive them of this gift.
Just as the howling dervish in front of the church in Putnok wants to deprive his controllable, hate-filled admirers of normality and decency and turn them into a herd ready to be lynched. This is also a kind of religious fanaticism, only of the Satanist kind. He dares to do what he does because he knows that those he rebels against will not fight back. The Christian person forgives and looks at the mentally ill with the same forgiving smile, as those leaving the church in Putnok did the same with the person leaving the truck bed.
I would like to know one thing.
Would the same figure dare insult the Muslims leaving the mosque?
I am afraid that the very brave Libshevik Pyotr Vengerský would not be able to scream there for long, because his mouth would be shut forever.
Author: György Tóth Jr
Cover image: Péter Magyar and the devout / Stand up, Hungarians! - Respect and Freedom Party Community Facebook
