We have to face the painful connection that the family support incentive of the targeted Hungarian middle class has reached its ultimate limits.
The Financial Times published a lengthy article about the Hungarian family support policy, which it says has collapsed. Using dramatic examples, he suggests that the demographic strategy of the Hungarian government was flawed from the beginning and in principle, so the fall was inevitable. There is nothing surprising in the fact that the "reality industry works" of the global opinion power system, one of the main operators of which is the Financial Times, writes about the failure of one of the crucial efforts of the Hungarian government, which is considered a strategic opponent. However, it is
it is a fact that in recent times the number of births and the underlying fertility have been decreasing again, so the strategy at least needs to be reconsidered.
The demographic processes of a human community show how the given human community shapes its own physical body, therefore population and health, like two sides of a sheet of paper, are inseparable from each other. The human community called the Hungarian nation, no matter how sad it is to face it, does not treat its own physical body well, and this has very deep and long-standing spiritual, moral and spiritual reasons.
We have a strange relationship with these spiritual, moral and spiritual reasons, because on the one hand we are fully aware of them, on the other hand we try to deny and suppress them in every possible way, so as the title of an old movie said, "no one knows anything", while of course everyone knows everything. As Viktor Orbán put it in his presentation in Tusnád Fürdő last year, we have become "hedonistic pagans" (the European Christian white man), and
a hedonistic heathen who ostensibly “enjoys life” is actually systematically dismantling it.
As the cynical phrase of the American demographer Ben Wattenberg suggests, "the capitalism is the best contraceptive". Allow a traditional society to impose the way of existence of westernized modernity, which has been around for more than half a millennium, but only calls itself capitalism since the 19th century, and life ceases.
The word capitalism implies that it is a very successful "capital accumulation" system, so far
it "gifts humanity with unimaginable prosperity", which could even be true if it did not destroy and rob it on the "other side"
as an unscrupulous parasite, he would not destroy the "inner nature" of human existence, his spiritual, moral, and spiritual foundation by polluting the earth, water, and air, which precludes the possibility of a healthy life in the first place, and which is the most dramatic essence behind this.
Well-intentioned state interventions can and should at least slow down our downward slide on this fatal slope, but by the nature of the matter, there is no chance of turning back and recreating the conditions of a dignified human life.
Of course, this is evidence that we all know, but we don't see the point in confronting it.
Actually, I don't want to talk about this either, but only about a connection related to this insoluble dilemma, which is one of the most delicate and mostly ignored elements of this "practical management". And the essence of this is a question that, at first hearing, may not be really understandable, but if we put it in an understandable way, it goes against the false and hypocritical standards of "political correctness".
The simplest formulation of this dilemma is to finally decide who should reproduce.
The aforementioned article of the Financial Times - obviously not by chance - is aimed exactly at this, one of the commentators even utters Zsuzsa Ferge's famous phrase that a "perverse redistribution" is taking place here, please. Behind this poisonous concept lies the logic of social organization, the essence of which is that if anything, then the poorest, even those living in the most miserable conditions, must be unconditionally financially supported in having children, in whose case the most children are born from a unit of resources. . In other words, the whole matter is about "specific costs", the "production and upbringing" of a child costs relatively the least if we generously finance the extended reproduction of poverty. This was roughly (and still is) the essence of the liberal strategy formulated by Zsuzsa Ferge, the "grandmother" of Hungarian sociology.
In other words, it is "good" if the state finances the production of masses of degraded, subservient labor force and - what is even more important - pariahs of consumer power, with the mass reproduction of those who have been plundered with cynical recklessness by liberal capitalism in a material, physical, spiritual, moral and spiritual sense, this is the only acceptable form of "correct" redistribution.
Never mind, this undoubtedly best suits the parasitic logic of liberal global capitalism, but the question is whether the human community in a difficult situation called the Hungarian nation should also follow this. The answer is clearly no, and the Hungarian government has followed a strategy that is exactly the opposite of this during the past decade. But we have to face the painful connection that
the stimulation of the targeted Hungarian middle class reached its ultimate limits.
This "middle class", which makes up a maximum of 15 percent, is not "in the middle" in terms of its incomes and assets, but very much "above", but what is even more important in the patterns of its principles of existence, it has become "global conform". In other words, he mostly wants to send his only child to a "good" university, and then he wants a "good" job for him. This means that you want to insert it "well" into this global self-liquidation, and with that the circle closes.
Source: Magyar Hírlap
Cover image: Pixabay
