The Democratic presidential candidate is an incompetent idiot. A fool. And he says such things because that is what his agents in the media and the deep state expect of him. And without them, not only would he be a presidential candidate, but he would be nothing. Written by Zsolt Bayer.
Let's look at the hard facts first!
Hard fact, one:
On CBS News' Late Show with Stephen Colbert, which was posted on the show's YouTube channel, the host began talking about how Republican opponent Kamala Harris and former White House leader Donald Trump likes to talk about his "close" relationship with Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, With Chinese President Xi Jinping and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un.
However, then Kamala Harris interrupted him and said about the mentioned persons (among whom he included the Hungarian Prime Minister):
Dictators, autocrats and people who can rightfully be called murderers. He also added: in his opinion, Trump himself wants to become a "dictator" like those he sympathizes with, but the aforementioned leaders are only "playing" with him and taking advantage of him.
Hard facts, two:
"Yes, you can say that," according to the Guardian, Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris succinctly answered the question at the Detroit stop of her campaign tour, whether Donald Trump is a fascist.
So, according to one of the possible next presidents of the United States, the Hungarian prime minister is a dictator and a murderer. You can rightfully call him a murderer.
Above is interesting. We'll come back to this later, but let's look at the other two first!
Kim Jong Un is a mentally ill dictator and murderer. A mass murderer. We can only hope that his people will rise up one day and do it the way it should be done for such people. Xi Jinping is the unquestionably powerful leader of a communist dictatorship and, as such, a dictator. He's definitely not a killer, though.
If we've made it this far, it's time to look behind things.
Looking behind things, one:
"The economic divergence between China and the United States has become more and more intense, and in the recent period, the parties have realized that their supply chains and technological systems are almost unimaginable without the participation of the other party. Although a more conciliatory tone has been struck at high-ranking political meetings in the past period, there is little willingness on both sides to settle this conflict. The technological development and production war thus became inevitable.
Anja Manuel, executive director of the Aspen Security Forum, spoke about the current state of American-Chinese relations at the Asia Society's July conference on the topic, and highlighted the complexity of American-Chinese relations. He expressed cautious optimism, pointing to recent diplomatic efforts, including successful visits by senior officials from both sides. In July, US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and Foreign Minister Antony Blinken visited China, during which they struck a more cooperative tone with their Chinese counterparts than we have seen in the past.
At the same time, he acknowledged that there is still tension between the two nations and that there is a strong conflict in certain sectors, especially in the field of technology, which is why the complete separation from each other has started. But as the expert pointed out, despite the challenges, economic relations between the United States and China remain strong. In the economic field, the relationship between the USA and China is actually quite close. This is hardly mentioned in the American press, but we conducted the largest volume of bilateral trade between the two countries ever measured, he added. (Portfolio, July 26, 2023)
Now tell me what things are happening! So there is an autocrat, a dictator who can rightly be called a murderer, according to Kamala Harris, and with him and his country "the largest volume of bilateral trade ever measured" is currently being conducted.
Looking behind things, two:
"Contact between the United States and China took place very early after the American War of Independence, as early as 1784, when the ship Empress of China arrived in Canton. The USA tried to break out of the British trade ring in the direction of China, for this reason the XIX. During the 19th century, flourishing economic relations developed between the two states, which were settled by the Treaty of Wangxia concluded in 1844. The XIX During the 20th century, many Chinese guest workers, so-called Coolie moved to the United States. Although trade relations were lively, the USA did not have a major military fleet or naval bases in the region until the end of the century. After the Spanish-American War, the acquisition of Hawaii and Midway, the American military presence became felt - by this time, however, the other colonial powers had already begun to divide the Manchu Empire into spheres of interest. To counteract this, the USA announced and had the other states accept the so-called Hay doctrine, which ensured that the USA could participate in Chinese trade on equal terms with other colonial powers (the principle of open doors)." (Wikipedia)
This is so clear and so typical that I prefer not to add anything to it. On the contrary, I would like to carefully note that the United States settled its relations with China between 1969 and 1970: Kissinger and Zhou Enlai, Nixon and Mao. I say Mao!
Let me tell you, was Mao an autocratic dictator who could rightly be called a murderer? And if so, why did they contact him?
I will tell you:
"However, by the end of the 1960s, the question arose in the leadership circles of the two states for different reasons, but at roughly the same time: is it possible to develop bilateral relations, and what benefits could come from this? American diplomacy led by Henry Kissinger and Chinese diplomacy led by Zhou Enlai gave positive answers to these questions primarily for geopolitical reasons, more specifically in an effort to curb the influence of the Soviet Union, although both sides had to overcome significant psychological obstacles to do so." (Wikipedia)
Okay, we get it. The United States also has no permanent friends and enemies, only interests. And as a result, the United States - and its particularly vile and dishonest leaders - appoint someone as a dictator and murderer along those interests, right? How else could we explain, for example, the fact that - looking behind things, three - in relation to Saudi Arabia, the USA has never raised the situation of human rights, women's equality, LGBTQ issues, while it does nothing else in relation to Iran.
According to them, Saudi Arabia is an exemplary liberal democracy, while Iran is a dark dictatorship? A horse...rt, mom! It's all about the fact that the United States is currently classifying other countries in the world according to its own interests, and is acting like an ugly pharisee and hypocrite and lying all over the place. And of course he rushes down and invades countries, murders such and such leaders here and there in the most vile way possible, and if necessary, uses his secret service to wiretap the chancellor of his most important and strongest European ally, Germany.
The intercepted: Angela Merkel. The eavesdropper: Barack Obama. You have to spit, phew!
And now that we've looked behind all these things, let's return to the Hungarian Prime Minister for a moment!
Viktor Orbán is neither an autocrat (they love this term, because it doesn't really mean anything to those who use it, that's why you can pull it on anyone, and besides, they imagine themselves to be very smart and enlightened), nor a dictator, and maybe Kamala Harris won't be offended , if we state that the Hungarian Prime Minister is not even a murderer.
But why does the Democratic presidential candidate say such things? Mainly because he's an incompetent idiot. A fool. And secondly, because this is what is expected of him by his officers in the media and the deep state. And without them, not only would he be a presidential candidate, but he would be nothing.
And if we have clarified all this, then let's also clarify that if someone is called a fascist in this environment, as Kamala Harris Trump is now, it means nothing just like autocrat and other bullshit. It doesn't mean anything any more than any of David Pressman's vile and disgusting things about us. They only happen according to the perceived or real interests of the USA and its deep state, its dishonest and cheap imprints.
However, there have been two assassination attempts against Trump so far, but maybe three. And one against Robert Fico, and it almost didn't end in death.
But they mean something. That as long as the woke world thinks it can claim anything about anyone, declare anything, call anyone anything, denigrate, dictator, murder, fascism anyone, there will be terrible consequences.
And according to the main rule, this is how it looks like here:
This is how they lie and slander about right-wing ("fideszes", "NER") politicians and public figures: right-wing drug addicts between the ages of 25 and 35; straight gay between 35 and 45; Right-wing corrupt between 45 and 55; Agent over 55 years of age.
This is their leader of the villains who are in the domestic media and opposition politics, and their officers are somewhere out there, mainly in the United States.
And of course, in addition to all this, the right-wing politician and public figure is eo ipso autocrat, dictator, murderer, fascist and Nazi. China and Russia are now again the evil empire, as in the "best" years of the Cold War.
In the meantime, of course, trade with these countries continues undisturbed, only now under grass. And with Saudi Arabia over grass, because everything is fine there.
Well, that's how seriously you have to take it when this incompetent, but at least adequately evil and vile scumbag murders Viktor Orbán.
Featured image: Zoltán Havran
