This book by Mátyás Kohán should be made compulsory in secondary schools, like Kosztolányi's Pacsirta - I hope it is still compulsory. Yes, Pacirtá, as Ákos rebels one night against fate, destiny and their many decades of lies - writes Zsolt Bayer in his recommendation, because in this article everything you need to know about this mass of lies and pus, whose name is "liberal rule of law", and "pluralism", and USA.
And then the Kohan writing:
"Joseph R. Biden and his family announce this with a heart full of pain, but calm in God's will.
Rule of law. A homely, sunny place, which we, the traveling public of the Hungarian hybrid regime, can only wish for like a beautiful stream. A place where the word of the powerful before the seat of the law is only worth as much as that of the dispossessed, where there are no equals or more equals, where there are no oligarchs, no irrefutable offers, no mutts, scumbags, corruption cats and robbers. Where, as a result, the citizen breathes freely, the artist creates without limits, and the entrepreneurial spirit also soars unhindered.
The United States is such a place. Right? Not.
Certainly not since Sunday - not even if Donald Trump, who is dearer to the Hungarian heart, will soon become its president.
On Sunday, Joe Biden pardoned his son, Hunter, almost like a folk tale, despite his promise as a presidential candidate and even after he left the campaign that he would not do so. And although in the justification of the pardon decision, he referred to the fact that the court treated Hunter in a politically biased manner in the case of a gun permit obtained by lying about his drug past, the pardon includes all of Hunter's known and unknown crimes from the beginning of 2014 to December 2024 for the sake of safety. That is: although of course looking at Hunter's businesses in Ukraine with a sardonic eye is a contrepreneur wearing a tin foil helmet,
but it's better if the court doesn't look into this matter either - it's sure to be annoying.
Of course, many American presidents have already granted pardons to those close to them, and the founding fathers of many countries granted pardon powers to their heads of state for a good reason. There is nothing wrong with the power of pardon, maybe even rescuing in-laws and comas from the slums with soda is acceptable. In the case of Biden, an honest explanation of the Hunter pardon would have sounded very simple: Dear Americans! I am an 82-year-old, family-oriented old man, fate has unleashed far more family tragedies on me than I deserved. I am asking you, please, let me not have to visit my only remaining son, this half-witted wretch, from whom I was never able to make a decent person, behind bars in the last years of my life. This is what a fair justification for a presidential pardon decision looks like: I bring out a sinner because I see fit and I can do it. But Biden is not justified by this.
"I believe in the justice system, but as I've struggled with this whole thing, I also believe that raw politics has infected this process and led to judicial malpractice."
This is a not very formal English sentence, in which Joe Biden settles accounts with the American rule of law: he does not believe that the justice system of the United States, which he has led for four years, is free from political influence, so he would remove his family from its scope with the kind permission of the American people..."
The full opinion article can be read by clicking HERE
MTI/EPA pool/Michael Reynolds
