While the WHO's newly published guidelines (coincidentally drawn up with the cooperation of a Planned Parenthood employee) advocate that for women's rights and human rights reasons, any fetus can be aborted indefinitely, i.e. even until birth (every woman has the right to post-abortion syndrome, and every female fetus has the right to be liquidated before he can even open his mouth), to the greatest glory of these same women's and human rights, two or three surrogates still give birth today in Ukraine, in some basement, so that, for example, through the mediation of the Netflix dystopia-like company BioTexCom, a German, a Swedish, Spanish or American, or possibly a Chinese couple can have a child against the payment of an appropriate amount. I mean, it will happen at some point, because because of the war, the principals don't get into the country much, like that
the babies are currently in a basement, chaotically numbered, waiting to be picked up.
By the way, BioTexCom, which also has a partner in Hungary, rightly points out in its name that this is a lucrative business: from the HUF 15-24 million paid by couples (a 3 percent discount during Black Friday!! in exchange for the higher amount, the gender of the baby can also be chosen!! ) the Ukrainian surrogate mother receives a total of HUF 3-3.5 million: that's the rent for her uterus, or rather her whole body, for nine months. Of course, you usually also have to pay for an egg donor (he gets hryvnias equivalent to HUF 185,000), so the child will have an anonymous biological mother, a surrogate mother, who takes care not to build any kind of emotional bond with the fetus during the pregnancy, as well as a his foster mother, who is legally his mother, and a father, who in the current situation may not take him in their arms for the first time only months after his birth. Which, by the way, was already a practice during the coronavirus - and then this is even the best case, because in the case of premature, injured babies, it is not uncommon for the customers to end up not asking for the scraps at all.
They are manufactured and then remain there as Ukrainian orphans (return goods, quasi). I looked for the WHO's opinion on all this in terms of human rights, but it seems that it has no say in this matter - the main thing is that the reproductive rights of all paying clients are fully guaranteed.
In any case, BioTexCom has uploaded a video, according to which they can accommodate up to two hundred people in their shelter (at the moment, 600 surrogate mothers are carrying children with them) - in comparison, there is one toilet and a single electric stove, plus a few beds and a bunch of sleeping bags on the bare ground. It is not as if the company treats surrogate mothers, who are mostly very poor, more carefully in peacetime: in the last stages of pregnancy, they have to live in a separate, supervised accommodation, where there is sometimes a bed for two women. In the ninth month, this can be especially convenient, long live women's rights.
News portals celebrate as heroes the foreign parents who, despite the war, travel to Kiev for the paid and born baby and take it home under adverse conditions
- while it is at most the "absolute minimum" category that one does not leave the vulnerable baby alone for weeks or months, who was raped by financing an obscure business and using the body of an unfortunate woman. Especially considering that after the adventure, the couples return home to their comfortable, safe well-being, while the surrogate mothers (who usually raise their own children alone) stay there in the middle of the war, with milk fever. There is less talk about the latter: the statues of the colonizers of centuries ago must be torn down because they badly exploited others in order to satisfy their own desires, on the other hand, let's assume that the vulnerable Ukrainian surrogate mother living today, who collects in her own basement, did well, since she was able to help a Westerner in exchange for a paid pregnancy party to satisfy their own desires.
Of course, this is when the main argument usually comes up: why should these children not be born? Would this be Christian life protection?
Yes, no matter how heartless it sounds: these children, who are contracted for money by a company called BioTexCom (previously involved in the suspicion of organ trafficking), who develop as items to be delivered, as a means of temporary escape from deep poverty, in a foreign womb, and whose parents (customers) are so they are unable to give up their own ideas, that they do not shy away from methods that are illegal in their country - well, yes, these are the children who should not be forced.
At least if I were a potential fetus and I could choose who I would go to, a profit-oriented Ukrainian company + surrogate mother + a middle-aged couple carrying out the child project at all costs, or a couple in their twenties, accidentally slipped in and supported by infertile pro-life advocates, I would most likely choose the latter. And I would be forever grateful to the infertile pro-lifers for allowing me to be born exactly where I wanted to be.
Source: Francesca Rivafinoli/vasarnap.hu
Featured image: YouTube
