The opposition's main problem is that the government is changing things that it itself previously created. The creation of which was not good in the opposition's interpretation, its application was harmful, but its further maintenance would be good.

Due to the long Covid, but despite the war situation, the Tünci generation, bored with a lack of stimulation, took to the streets this time because of the kata amendment. (This is not what the article is about, but I can't help it: 122,811 forints are deducted from my gross teacher's salary of 426,300 forints every month - and there is also a small tax discount for the youngest child in this - while a katás pays only 50,000 up to a million in income. )

In any case, the opposition, playing the dishonorable role of the mop for the fourth time in the hands of the repeatedly failed and humiliated Fidesz cleaners who keep the floor of the parliament clean, immediately jumped on the matter and, not being able to give anything other than their essence, instead of developing solutions and proposals in detail, they are trying to excel in creating chaos . The fact that they resorted to closing the bridge, which testifies to their complete lack of innovative abilities, which was already demonstrated effectively by the taxi drivers, but less effectively by Budaházy and his supporters, but they spoke up. And this is where the not-yet-constructed argument system collapsed. They are protesting against the abolition (revision) of a type of tax that they never introduced, and they did not even vote for it as an opposition when it was introduced.

They are indignant about the partial cancellation of the overhead reduction, while they never supported it, in fact, they constantly criticized and opposed it and sided with market prices.

Their main problem is that the government is changing things that it itself previously created. The creation of which was not good in the opposition's interpretation, its application was harmful, but its further maintenance would be good.

Who understand this? If the cabinet suddenly started sending weapons to the Ukrainians, would they be honored for that?

When Covid hit us, they urged closure. It happened. Then that was the problem. At first they advocated vaccination, but when they started to vaccinate as a campaign, they criticized it.

From 1956 for more than thirty years, it was proclaimed that it was a counter-revolution, and anyone who says otherwise is a reactionary, extremist criminal. But hip-hop changed to revolutionaries when it became the mainstream, and those who had previously intended to erase even the memory of Imre Nagy whined about moving the statue of the former prime minister. NATO was criticized and scolded as long as it was an enemy, then suddenly Gyula Horn himself, a former foreign minister committed to the Warsaw Pact, raised NATO accession in the Parliament, and they became the loudest Atlanticists.

But the introduction of annual county stickers, for example, was welcomed by the entire population, even though they pay the same amount of highway tolls from Budapest to Lake Balaton for a year as they can travel the Dalmatian coast back and forth once. (If they don't go too far south.)

On the one hand, the Bokros package was proven to be a brilliant economic move, but the threat of the "Bokros package" is repeatedly used as a verbal weapon if they want to sniff out government austerity. They try to apostrophize the Ószödi speech as a glorious speech of truth, excusing the indefensible, but they are happy to use it as a curse word, if they can refer to some manifestation as, for example, "Orbán's Ószödi speech".

The acceptance of deviance is heralded as a virtue, but the individual is stigmatized. Thus, the accusation of violent support for any form of free love will be used as a crowbar if it is committed by Borkai or Szájer.

The opposite of Christian teaching, which persecutes sin but forgives the sinner. They glorify sin, but condemn the sinner. Of course, only if he belongs to the national-conservative side, because that is the original sin.

Source: Vasarnap.hu

Author: Zsolt Ungváry

Image: Flag Magazine