The Svung – Hungarian Hungarian Theater in Vienna performed the three fairy tale transcriptions of Everyone's Fairy Tale by contemporary authors in a puppet show – in Vienna. According to the director, the fact that they could not do this in front of children in Hungary is like when people went to Austria for porn magazines in the 80s.
Well, dear Tamás Pille, no, it's not like that. Not because before - and after - the system change, following their own decision, 3-6-year-old children did not go out for porn in addition to their craving for Gorenje freezers and Milka chocolates, but if that had been the case, no one would have wanted sexual content on them. to poke Those who did, ended up in prison for pedophilia, where at the bottom of the food chain they could wonder why even law enforcement officers are so angry that they want to beat them to death all the time.
But first, let's see what the Telex journalist wrote after watching the premiere!
Meseorzág is everyone's , published by the Labrisz Leszbicus Egyesület in 2020, is the most commonly read sensitizing - homosexual propaganda in other readings, and pedophile in another reading - an anthology," notes Barbara Vincze by way of introduction.
That this publication, in which no trace of originality can be found - we emphasize again: it is a distorted transcription of fairy tales already written by someone - would be "sensitizing in the most frequent reading", is a problematic statement from several points of view.First, during the child protection referendum held in 2022
3,610,154 people voted to "DO NOT hold a session showing sexual orientation for minors in public educational institutions without the consent of the parent".
Only 300,282 answered yes to the same question. Labrisz's undisclosed goal is to "popularize" the rewritten fairy tales in kindergartens and schools, to indoctrinate other people's children in Hungarian, and if 92.32 percent of the Hungarians who participated in the poll said no to this, "the most frequent reading" as a definition, which refers to a superior majority, is not stand the test of reality.
Secondly, the problem is also etymological, since he talks about sensitization, as if our children are insensitive. Similar to the overwriting of the original meaning of the rainbow - the symbol of God's covenant with man and animals - we can now also witness a kind of rewriting, filling it with new content.
Do they really have no ideas of their own?
According to the Wiktionary, the meaning of the verb formed from the adjective "sensitive" - the opposite of which is "insensitive" - is as follows:
“It makes you vulnerable; makes you very sensitive to changes. It transforms into experiencing increased pain or discomfort for minor external influences."
However, the dictionary of the Hungarian language from 1862 still puts it this way:
"It makes you sensitive, i.e., it moves you, especially incites you to bitterness, sorrow, pity, sympathy. To sensitize students' hearts to giving. A beautiful church speech sensitizes the faithful."
However, none of the dictionaries provide such an explanation as the Childcare (?) portal :
"In the field of education, sensitization is a relatively new term. It means one or more techniques to make someone else's deviation from the norm tolerable (or acceptable).
It is true that this portal - whose Imprint does not reveal who operates it - also describes in the name of new language If families raise children in such a way that they teach them about universal human rights, or if there is a general education in the school system, which (among other things) would teach them from an early age that people are born with the same rights, regardless of skin color, origin, or family situation."
Now, that's itDid you think that in Switzerland women only got the right to vote in 1971, and that they could vote under the same conditions as men? Or that women in Saudi Arabia have had the opportunity to drive for only five years, since 2018, and that the ban on going to the cinema was also lifted for them only recently? Partly, of course, because why exaggerate.
"In this puppet show, the independent troupe tackled the themes of sexual difference, people with disabilities and ethnicity with a brave hand. The performance remains within the framework of traditional puppetry, but also works with live actors. Tamás Pille originally wanted to present the play in Hungary, but the theaters he approached with the idea of adaptation did not take the risk, probably because they were afraid of withdrawing state subsidies."
No, dear Barbara, not because it is against the law. You do not remember? However, the director complained to you at length about the Hungarian child protection law, which you linked to!"A part of the Saturday premiere audience - including the book's project manager and the authors - came to the presentation from Budapest, but the majority live in Vienna. Only a few children could be seen in the auditorium. The caution on the part of parents is understandable (...) Obviously, no one would expose their child to far-right trolls..."
This comment is especially adorable, on the one hand it's charming, as the author sensitizing to tolerance casually labels anyone whose opinion differs from his as a far-right troll, on the other hand, his insight brings tears to my eyes, as he deduces with brilliant logic why there were so few children in the audience.
"The Hungarian Child Protection Act does not allow us to perform this show for children in Hungary, because it would be subject to the 18th ring," says actor-director Tamás Pille after the show, who has been targeting children and youth audiences in his productions for years.
You see, Barbara! I talked about this.
But it's not over yet, because the director continues:
"That's why we can perform the play in Hungary, since there is freedom of speech, hahaha, but only adults can watch it. If a vulgar word is spoken at a concert at a festival, a child may hear it, but not the story of the three-eared rabbit. If someone were to bring their children to a show like this, it would be like butchering a pig in the '50s. It's like when people came to Vienna for the porn magazine in the 80s. Now sneak in here, whoever wants to see the three-eared rabbit with their child.”
Hahaha – this is the best part of the flood of complaints; a little didactic, but good.
The misunderstanding, the falsification, the slippage, however, reach the nerve roots of normality here, so I am writing screaming: no, a Hungarian child cannot listen to the story of the three-eared rabbit who advanced to become a hero - which is available to anyone on YouTube, even in the performance of Dorottya Udvaros – but unsolicited bundling.I couldn't figure out how the 1950s pork butchering fits into the picture, in contrast to the porn magazine analogy, see above.
Influencing 3-6 year old children with any kind of sexual content is neither innocent nor sensitizing. Children are not insensitive. Of course, the non-existent LGBTQ lobby also knows this, precisely, as well as that this age is a period of unconditional acceptance. It's time to stop watching the mainstream media stupid:
for a reason, you singled out the members of the most vulnerable age group, who are, by the way, other people's children.
And this means that others conceived and brought them into the world, others bear the responsibility for them and the costs of their education, others are their joys and burdens, others take care of them when they are sick, others study and play with them, others dress them, bathe them and put them to sleep, others cry or laugh with them; in other words, the apple of other people's eyes. And not yours.
It's time to find a new hobby.
Featured Image: Screenshot from the “Generation Drag” Discovery+ series
