By bypassing Hungary, the Soros network analyst would exclude our country from the European Union's decision-making.
The researcher of the Soros network considers the procedure according to the seventh article and all the EU's efforts to deprive Hungary and the "other troublemakers" of their right to vote, within legal frameworks, to be an unnecessary waste of time.
Dalibor Rohac - who has attacked Hungary several times - explains in his article published in Politico:
"Europe should not be concerned with how to punish Hungary and take away Viktor Orbán's right to vote according to EU treaties and legislation, but with what practical means can be used to make decisions bypassing our country - and the other Eastern European countries. According to him, politics cannot be reduced to just following the rules, it is much more complex".
The challenges of the Slovak analytical Europe living in America cannot be approached through the current, "technocratic lens", instead of the cynical compulsion to adapt to the laws of the European Union, the member states need more flexibility, that is, practices that can be used to realize the ideas despite Viktor Orbán's veto .
The author cited the case of Ukraine's accession to the EU as an example. He explained that the idea that the withdrawal of Hungary's right to vote and a lawsuit against the European Commission could stop Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán - or another member state - from preventing Ukraine from joining the EU is far from reality. The decision to start negotiations was an important message for Ukraine, but at the same time, "Viktor Orbán will have the opportunity to veto Kyiv's EU accession at least 72 more times."
The anti-Hungarian publicist also warned that complying with the laws is not just a simple technical task, politics is much more complex than that: Slovakia, or even Romania, would definitely not vote to remove Hungary's right to vote, because they would have a well-founded fear that they would be next after our country.
In addition, he also pointed out that criticism of EU institutions is often justified. He cited Poland as an example, where the new government aims to remove people from the previous right-wing government from the public media and the courts.
These personnel exchanges are based on politically motivated decisions, yet the European institutions show little interest.
Rohac also gives examples of his idea. According to Soros's man, there should be no time for the member states to convince Viktor Orbán in new negotiations to vote for the 50 billion euro financial aid intended for Ukraine. Instead, with the participation of Brussels, the other 26 member states can record this in intergovernmental agreements, thus excluding Hungary from the process.
He added that the European Union would be able to handle the challenges of the future with practical decision-making like this.
In recent years, Dalibor Rohac regularly criticized the Hungarian government in the international press and built a relationship with the Hungarian opposition. An employee of an American research institute published his first article disparaging Hungary in the Weekly Standard in 2012, entitled "Hungary's Road to Slavery".
He proposed financial tightening against our country, accused our country of corruption and serving Russian interests, but Rohac was also one of the international experts who spread the clear hoax about our country, that by extending the state of emergency, the Hungarian government abolished parliamentary democracy.
Cover image: Many participants of the EU summit would not vote to revoke Hungary's right to vote
Source: Facebook/Viktor Orbán
