"Juszt himself will be mine" - Ferenc Gy., the perpetrator and Juszt, could sing in his excited solitude. And it was, because "Kezitcsókolom" Lacika also remained an "independently objective" Bolshevik of the Libshevik side.
In his fact-finding works, Gábor Mező also mentions Lacika as a loyal follower of the Bulgarian and Soviet line, but this is now incidental. Everyone knew about him and perhaps even today they have not forgotten that his father's not-so-young son spread his wings with the support of the former ÁVH member Pál Ipper and the extremely hateful Endre Aczél, so this guy received an excellent Bolshevik school. But now he is independent. And impartial. Not to mention how objective it is.
And how hurt it was that he couldn't unleash his huge ego after the regime change. Is it any wonder that he smears the Christian-conservative side as best he can? Because
he's a genius with great talent, who couldn't have the career he was rightfully entitled to only because the "right wing" cut him off.
He has been a mud-throwing enemy of Viktor Orbán for a long time, his Facebook page is littered with hateful comments, he splutters when he needs to, when he doesn't.
Of course, he jumped at the new president of the republic like a hyena at an antelope. By the way, he could not be anti-theft, since a court ruling says the opposite, i.e. he is not anti-theft. But back to your post.
Just for the sake of it, and just for the sake of it, he slanders not only Tamás Sulyok, but almost all the presidents nominated by the conservative side. His source is undoubtedly authentic, as he read it from Hósipő. Yes, if Farkasházy's paper wrote it, then it is true. That Sulyok is lying about his father's past. How fortunate that Juszt does not have to do this, since his father, as a former communist deputy minister, is an open book to everyone. We know who he was and we suspect that he had nothing to do with his son's career. It was not, as Lacika's talent almost shined through the scheming malice. It could also only be a minefield of the squeamish right that the shows of this sparkling mind failed one after another, even on ATV. Because of Zorban!
So Sulyok lied about his father. Because you have to lie, because for the sins of the fathers (if there were any at all) the sons have to atone for the sins of the seventies. Well, so be it, but then Lacika isn't atoning for the sins of the conservatives, but her father, isn't she? Although I believe that no one can be held responsible for what their ancestors did - if they were done at all.
But look, this Juszt kid also has problems with Pál Schmitt, János Áder and Katalin Novák.
Schmitt plagiarized, Áder only dared to confront the fish, he is a known liar anyway, and Katalin Novák is a pedophile liberator.
It is interesting that Juszt has no problem with Árpád Göncz, László Sólyom, but neither with Ferenc Mádl.
He couldn't find a single bad word to say about Mádl, but he couldn't, even though he would surely have liked to kick him if he could. He has no objection to the courage of Sólyom, who turned back on the Komárom bridge with death-defying audacity, because the Slovaks ordered him back, and before him, even as president of the Constitutional Court, he prevented the adoption of the Justice Act. But that's okay, let's not talk about it. And not about the damage done by the good Uncle Árpi, who crossed the first democratically elected government wherever he could. He was so independent that words cannot even describe it. Because there are no words for the independence that the SZDSZ represented.
However, Schmitt plagiarized. It was adorned with foreign feathers. It's not a nice thing, it's true, but where does this come from supporting the taxi blockade? By the way, he later labels Pál Schmitt a diploma forger, which is far from being the same as plagiarism, but our scribe does not seem to know this. I would like to draw your attention to the reality: a diploma is forged by someone who issues an untrue certificate of a degree that someone does not have. Plagiarism, on the other hand, means taking over the ideas of others without attributing the source.
Is it difficult to speak Hungarian, Comrade Just?
Áder is a liar - but when and what did he lie about? For example, he never claimed that Juszt was a journalist and not a hateful propagandist.
Is Katalin Novák a pedophile rescuer? Comrade Juszt, congratulations on the capital lie. Mrs. President has never exonerated any pedophile.
But don't let the reality bother your comrade, don't let the facts upset you, just keep your wits about you. By the way, you plagiarized because you spread the DK lie without attribution, and you are lying, see above. But that doesn't bother him either, after all, you are not the president of the republic. Thanks to the Creator!
Just sir, it's okay if someone hates you, it's just disgusting. It's okay if he lies, it's just disgusting.
The real trouble is when someone believes everything he himself claims. This is not a lie, nor is it hatred, "just" a pathological personality disorder.
Don't despair, it might still be treatable.
He just ends his Facebook post like this: "...a diploma forger, a pedophile exoner and a known liar. Skilled! And we keep them in luxury until they die... We really are the fools!”
Look, look! There is a sentence of self-criticism at the end.
Author: György Tóth Jr
Front page illustration: In the picture: actor János Gálvölgyi (b), journalist László Juszt (k) and humorist Farkasházy Tivadar. MTI Photo: Tibor Rózsahegyi
