I confess, even if the high-culture, lace-minded, but rather snobbish intellectual curses me, that one of my favorite book and film characters is James Bond, the British agent 007. In defense of his country, he was given the right to kill as he saw fit. Although killing is always forbidden, this is what is required by the Fifth Commandment. Do not kill!
Today, 00 agents are swarming and killing, murdering, butchering. Men are also on the battlefield, but what some women do to their fetuses is even more destructive. What is thou shalt not kill? How could he kill when it's more convenient for him.
The UN World Health Organization (WHO) - spitting its name in the face - voted in favor of free killing and falsely called the execution of fetuses a "reproductive right". Both members of the word composition carry a lie. What is reproduction? According to the definition of the Magyar Értelmező Kéziszótár, duplicating process, duplication, re-creation. Abortion is the exact opposite of this: termination, cancellation. And the fact that such a right exists is an absurd and anti-human claim, making endless and unlimited egoism and selfishness a basic right.
the European Parliament published a resolution according to which abortion is a fundamental right, it should be included in the EU's Charter of Fundamental Rights, and what's more, all support from pro-life organizations should be withdrawn. Why already? How to destroy the native population of Europe? If that's the goal, the tool is great. Let us disappear, and let the illegal immigrants take our place. Feticide does not fit into their "philosophy".
Some time ago, the countries of Europe abolished the death penalty, which, by the way, although it is often extremely difficult to accept, can be approved. Partly because I believe that only God has the right to take life, but I have another argument for the non-religious: entrusting a human life to a court is more than a mistake. Let's just imagine what the European Public Prosecutor's Office and the European Court of Justice would do to defendants with a Christian-conservative attitude? Or a court operating under the government of the Hungarian opposition? (We could also experience the latter in practice after Ferenc Gy.'s eye-popping action with the multitude of court-martial judgments.)
So there is no death penalty even for mass murderers, even though there are among them who massacred more than 70 innocent children and adults. This animal is winning lawsuits against the state because its cell does not face the sea and it does not get crawfish for dinner every day. He has rights, but the murdered do not. Meanwhile, hundreds of thousands of innocent fetuses are slaughtered without any problem, even though they can't help it that "mommy" had an enjoyable night. What kind of logic can dictate this insane position?
Of course the screaming comes, it's my body, I do what I want with it. A whine! It's growing in your body, but it's not yours. When it comes into the world, it comes out of you. Do you know what your body is? Which always remains. Your heart, liver, kidney, brain. If one of them "gets out of you", you no longer exist. You can freely dispose of your body, as long as you decide who you sleep with and when. You can also defend yourself if it is not difficult for you or if it is not too uncomfortable for you.
Don't let anyone come to me and tell me that despite this (defense), it happens that the child is conceived. Yes, it can happen, but as I have already explained countless times, the consequences of an "accident" must also be accepted. An example for those with a very poor understanding: I love driving a car, when I sit behind the wheel, I have no intention of harming anyone, but if I cause an accident due to a momentary omission, I have to bear the consequences. However, I enjoyed driving and didn't want to hit anyone.
Another argument is pregnancy due to violence. I can understand that the mother does not welcome a child conceived in this way, but the fetus has absolutely no control over how it was conceived. Can you be sentenced to death because of the bastard's father? Or maybe the principle "for the sins of the fathers the sons will be punished" is the guiding principle? According to them, the child should be sent to prison along with the criminal father, right?
We have known for a long time that the leaders of the majority of European countries are unscrupulous scoundrels, and among the representatives of the Union there is also a preponderance of escapees from mental institutions. However, it has only recently become clear that they are not simply outraged, but also mass murderers. Priests and priestesses of the cult of death, deities of murder. Seeing and hearing them inevitably reminds me of Ronald Reagan's thought: "I noticed that those who are pro-abortion have all already been born."
It's a shame that they were born late, they should have stood up for feticide first. Even before they were born.
Author: György Tóth Jr
Photo: Mirosław Iskra / Pixabay
