Klára Dobrev said on the YouTube channel ZSHOW time about the police brutality on October 23, 2006, which may have been directed by her husband, Ferenc Gyurcsány: " many policemen were injured, more policemen were seriously injured than protesters."
Well, that's when the knife in the pocket opens.
It's a great thing if someone protects her husband, but public opinion, especially young people, must not be deceived, history must not be falsified, not even for Ferenc Gyurcsány-Cipolla's wife, with the aim of exonerating the presumably main responsible for the orbital, democratic, human from his crime against rights, which does not expire morally.
In contrast to Dobrev's shameless fake news, here are a few lines from the pestisracok.hu article of September 17, 2016, entitled "To this day, they are not responsible for the bloody police excesses of 2006", written by Dávid Pámer
"...on the fiftieth anniversary of the outbreak of the 1956 revolution, Fidesz organized a celebratory mass meeting at Astoria in the capital. At the end of the commemoration, the peaceful civilians who were trying to go home from there were pressed by the cavalry charge of the police.
It is now a fact that the police used force disproportionately, unnecessarily and in violation of the law. The act of intimidation reminiscent of dictatorships resulted in 167 injuries (including 17 policemen and 5 foreigners), 33 of whom needed hospital treatment. Two participants of the demonstrations were also blinded in half of their eyes due to rubber bullets. Although hundreds of people complained about their abuse to the prosecutor's office, since the majority of the police officers who dispersed in helmets, masks, and without identification numbers could not be identified, only six of them were charged until April 2007.
So once again: 167 injured protesters and 17 injured police officers. Serious injuries were mainly suffered by the demonstrators, including MP Máriusz Révész, who was beaten in the head by the "victim" police officers.
Not to mention the fact that policemen and mounted policemen ran down the peaceful crowd - some of them not protesting, but celebrating - some of whom may have put their heads on the defensive, which is absolutely understandable in the given, vulnerable situation.
So Ms. Dobrev, take it back and stop lying morning, night and night, especially not orbitally outrageous ones!
It's just a shame that the police attacks in 2006 didn't actually have any legal consequences for those responsible for the horrific events. There were no consequences despite the fact that the Balsai Committee clearly established in its 2011 report that the police leaders - national police chief László Bene Péter Gergényi and their colleagues - acted not on their own initiative, but on the basis of higher political orders and incited the police on the people on October 23.
And hold on tight: a parliamentary resolution was also passed on this report.
It is enough for us that the retired Supreme Court Council President Miklós Völgyesi's persistent and consistent work as a "bulldog judge" for several years in order to have a legal consequence for what Gyurcsány did in the fall of 2006 is in vain.
To this day, it is quite a difficult task for us to endure, to somehow acknowledge, to somehow live with the outrageous fact that, in the legal sense, there is still no one responsible for the greatest brutality against democracy and human rights since the regime change, and that - in this respect - we remained a country without consequences.
That is why I strongly urge you, Ms. Dobrev, not to keep turning your knife in the still-living wound, because this is not a fair procedure and does not breed good blood.
Finally, one more thing: even if the legal consequences are left behind in connection with the 2006 police attacks, the moral consequences do not have to be left behind.
