At the campaign event called the debate of the opposition prime ministerial aspirants, all aspirants made it clear that after a possible election victory, no legal continuity will be an obstacle to governance. It was observed that the prime minister-designate-designates are threatening an even more radical political showdown than before and are making fear-mongering statements that threaten legal security and social peace, the XXI wrote in its analysis. Century Institute.

At the first "debate" of the opposition prime minister-candidate candidates, numerous promises made after a possible election victory were made that were incompatible with the rule of law and democracy. The opinion was unanimous that the opposition parties are thinking about the possibility of a constitutional coup called "regime change", rather than a change of government. During the campaign event planned according to the scenario, it was also revealed that their arbitrary - subjective - sense of justice is considered to be ahead of the existing constitutional framework, therefore they consider it necessary to eliminate the rule of law in order to realize their own "truth".

This political logic was characteristic of the Bolshevik movements, and the communist parties partly formed from them, which used internationally tested violent methods in Hungary as well.

- says the analysis written by Ervin Nagy. During the program presentation called the debate, the aspirants for prime minister indirectly admitted that the acquisition and possession of power is more important to them than the continuity of democratic relations, the maintenance of the constitutional and legal order. Because of all this, their campaign threatens social order, peace, and legal certainty even now, before the elections.

According to the analysis:

During the show, the increasingly radical statements related to "accountability" drew a vision of an autocratic system where there is no real legal security for the individual, where those in power are above the law and where law-abiding behavior is also questioned.

The radicalization of anti-democratic and rule-of-law promises and political intentions fits well into a broader, international perspective. The aim of the foreign-supported destabilization attempts between 2010 and 2020 was to create a quasi-civil war situation, which would lead to the fall of the Orbán government and whose long-term beneficiaries would be the left-wing opposition.

If a political community preparing to form a government and its leaders declare that they do not consider the constitutional requirements to be binding on themselves, and call the basic law illegitimate, then the law-abiding behavior of the citizen is easily questioned, which leads to unstable social conditions.

Overall, it can be said that the destabilization attempts organized with international support, the increasingly radical promises of the left, and the possibility of eliminating the rule of law threaten social order and legal security. The international and domestic left are working together to cause a social upheaval that could bring about the fall of the Orbán government. But while the left is trying to overthrow the government with violent and anti-democratic means, their irresponsible policy causes social instability, which can lead to a civil war situation - concludes the analysis.

The XXI. The complete analysis of the Század Institute HERE .

Source: PestiSrácok

Featured image: XXI. Century Institute