As a result of the three Harakiri attacks, Europe's economic and political weight in the world is showing a continuous downward trend, and in terms of defense, it is being pushed by America. Pál Bartha ny. forest engineer's writing.

Before the First World War, Europe dominated the world economically, politically and militarily, especially with regard to the huge colonial empires of England, France, the Netherlands and Belgium. Peace prevailed on the continent, with the exception of the Balkans. There was lively trade between the countries. The kings were related to each other, it seemed that there could be no war between them. This was the so-called the age of "happy times of peace". But the embers glowed beneath the ashes. The new industrial and military power, Germany, sought its place among the masters of the world, and Russia, striving towards the warm sea ports, became the protector of the Orthodox peoples of the Balkans.

The pretext for the outbreak of the World War was the assassination of the heir to the throne of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy, Ferenc Ferdinand, in Sarajevo, but the real cause was German imperialism.

At that time, the United States of America was a rapidly developing, but still militarily insignificant, isolationist state. The USA did not enter the war until April 6, 1917 on the side of the Entente, but it was only able to field a serious force towards the end of the war. It was probably this help that tipped the standing war in Western Europe in favor of the Entente. The long-term interests of the USA were served by the fact that European countries at war with each other weakened themselves, i.e. Europe. And the unfair peace system around Paris also made it impossible for European countries to have an appropriate level of economic cooperation. The First World War was Europe's first Harakiri!

The Paris peace system imposed an immeasurable financial burden on Germany, into which Germany fell into anarchy. "At the peak of inflation, a wheelbarrow full of 100 billion marks in banknotes could not buy even a loaf of bread." - writes Ellen Brown in "How did Germany get out of financial bankruptcy?" in his book.

Then came the great economic crisis of 1929-33. In 1933, Hitler came to power with demagoguery and terror.

I quote at length from E. Brown's book because the brilliant German finance minister, Dr. Hjalmar Schacht, has pulled Germany out of economic bankruptcy in an instructive way. Quote from the mentioned book:

"We were not fools to introduce a currency based on gold, which we did not have...at that time we laughed at our bankers, who were of the view that the value of the currency was regulated by gold and the securities resting in the vaults of the state bank," he said. Adolf Hitler…the plans of the international banking cartel were thwarted by issuing their own money. In this they imitated Abraham Lincoln...Hitler began his national credit program by devising a public works plan...his plans included the regulation of rivers, the repair of public buildings and private residences, the construction of roads, bridges, canals and harbor facilities. The planned cost of the various programs was fixed at 1 billion units of the national currency. After that, 1 billion in non-inflationary bills, called Treasury labor certificates, were issued against this cost… Workers then spent these certificates on other goods and services, creating even more jobs for even more people. The problem of unemployment was solved within two years and the country got back on its feet. He had solid, stable money, he had no debt, inflation was over... He achieved his success by using a barter system: he exchanged equipment and goods directly with other countries, bypassing international banks."

This is also how the famous German highways were built. Then E. Bown points out the parasitic nature of the financial oligarchy: "Stephen A. Zarlenga points out in his book The Lost Science of Money: The Mythology of Money, the Story of Power that it was because Germany was freed for a while by the English from economic theory—the theory that money should be borrowed against the gold reserves of a private banking cartel and not directly issued by the government.”

The brutal power of the Anglo-Saxon financial oligarchy is demonstrated by W. Churchill's speech in Bern in 1960: "The unforgivable sin of Germany is World War II. before World War II, it was an attempt to tear its economy out of the world trade system and to create its own financial system, from which the financial world can no longer profit...We slaughtered the weed pig." The destruction of Germany was therefore vital for the Anglo-Saxon financial oligarchy, because it feared that the German example might spread throughout the world.

At the same time, the USA once again waited to let the Europeans bleed by entering the Second World War. On December 7, 1941, the Japanese launched an air attack against the American naval base in Pearl Harbor. The USA could no longer tolerate this, and went to war against the Axis powers the next day. At that time, America already had a strong economy and a very strong military industry. All of these contributed decisively to the victory of the Allies. America gained enormous income from the transportation of munitions during the war and then from lending for reconstruction, while the country did not suffer war damage.

In contrast, Europe suffered far greater material destruction in World War II than in World War I, with more than fifty million people dead.

At the end of the war, the Americans took about six thousand German scientists home, including Werner von Braun, the father of the V-1, who later became the leader of the Apollo program. (Neil Armstrong stepped on the moon in 1969.) This ended German research and put German knowledge at the service of America. As a result of the above, after the Second World War, the USA became the master of the world militarily and economically.

Then the Iron Curtain came down in Central Europe, and with this practically all cooperation between East and West in Europe ceased.

The Second World War was Europe's second Harakiri!

Germany got over the loss of the war incredibly quickly, thirty years later the Germans were already living in enviable prosperity. Then, after the collapse of the socialist world system, a flourishing economic cooperation was established between Russia and Western Europe. America frowned upon this. He feared that a new world power stretching from Portugal to Vladivostok would emerge on the basis of cheap Russian energy and mineral wealth, as well as advanced Western technology.

Preventing this has become a matter of strategy for the US. This is proven by the press conference of George Friedman, an American geostrategist born in Budapest in 1949.

 

America singled out Ukraine for geopolitical reasons to prevent cooperation. They overthrew the pro-Russian Ukrainian government with an investment of five billion dollars, and then persuaded the stunned Ukrainians to ask Ukraine to join NATO. Russia could not tolerate this, war became inevitable. America immediately supported Ukraine with weapons, and other countries followed suit.

Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovakia quickly got rid of their outdated Soviet military equipment, and then the British, Germans, French and others supplied modern weapons. Then on January 19, 11 countries offered new arms shipments. Here is a great opportunity to modernize military technology, the part of the supplies that is no longer considered the most modern must be given to Ukraine! The exchange of arsenals means huge business for arms manufacturers, and this may be one of the reasons for the war hysteria.

With the prolongation of the war and the counterproductive sanctions, America reached its goal: the Union cut itself off from Russia's cheap energy sources and mineral resources in the long term. This is Europe's third Harakiri!

The financial burden is compounded by the deterioration of the Union's competitiveness, keeping the Ukrainian state alive with aid, and then the promised support for reconstruction. All of this mainly affects Europe! Regarding America's world domination, I would like to note that there were two attempts to break the power of the petrodollar, but these were nipped in the bud by NATO under the leadership of the USA.

A war started against Iraq in 2003 and against Libya in 2011, the real reason for which was that the two mentioned countries wanted to cancel the agreement according to which oil can only be sold for US dollars. Since this agreement is the basis for the stability of the dollar, NATO, led by America - freely quoting W. Churchill - slaughtered both weed pigs. Based on the practice of double standards, after the bombing and economic and social disintegration of the two large countries, no one demanded the imposition of sanctions against the countries that participated in the aggression, even though a war was started against both countries on false grounds.

Europe's first Harakiri was the First World War, as a result of which the continent was in economic and political decline. Europe's second Harakiri was the devastating Second World War, as a result of which the USA changed places with Europe and became the world's ruler economically and militarily. Europe's third threat is the long-term impossibility of economic cooperation between the Union and Russia. The Union exchanged cheap Russian energy for extremely expensive American energy. With its self-destructive policy, the Union helped the continuation of American world domination.

As a result of the three Harakiri attacks, Europe's economic and political weight in the world is showing a continuous downward trend, and in terms of defense, it is being pushed by America.

It cannot be assumed that the leaders of the Union are not aware of the above. Traitorous scoundrels lead the Union! The completely weakened Roman Empire was overthrown by the Germans in 476. The causes of all three harakiri in Europe are Germans: Germans and Anglo-Saxons.

It seems that the doom of Europe is Germanicism. The population of Europe has unfortunately replaced the cheerful Mediterranean way of life with the ruthless Anglo-Saxon pursuit of money.

What would happen to the country that would try to implement the brilliant economic and financial program of Dr. Hjalmar Schacht, the German finance minister today? I guess banks or tanks would mercilessly slaughter the weed pig!

Featured image: Reuters / Bernadett Szabo