There are globalist topos, repeated "demands", which may appear to be beneficial for a country (in our case, our country), but in fact they are not at all harmless. Such is the constantly voiced opinion that we should introduce the national currency, i.e. the euro instead of the HUF. But the "evil" Orbán government does not do this, so if the world savior Dobrev were to come, he would do it.

With some exaggeration, this promise is similar to the statement "tomorrow there will be a pheasant", for two reasons. On the one hand - hopefully - Dobrev won't come, and on the other hand, the bride is nowhere near as beautiful as they claim. When the common currency was introduced in quite a few EU member states, it meant a dramatic rise in prices almost everywhere except in Germany. So the question is valid: do we really need that euro?

Those who attended the evening of the Civil Academy in Dombóvár could hear the answer Imre Boros

– The euro is not what it was imagined to be. In fact, the euro is the dollar's little brother, and this could be seen very clearly in 2008, when the crisis practically came from America to Europe with one wave of the arm. The lost items were neatly packed and banks in Europe were robbed. So actually

it is worth thinking about the euro not as what it would have been, but as what it has become. I don't think we really need what happened. You really don't have to.

It is no coincidence that, for example, the Swiss did not intervene, nor did the Norwegians, even though they are massively part of the Western world. But for now, they haven't really put their hands up. And since we are not under duress, only leftist…

Sorry, left wing. I hate this term, there was no left wing in Hungary long ago and the last left wing was maybe Anna Kéthly , and even in the MSZMP there was a left wing, the one who thought in terms of the people and the nation. What do I know Mátyás Szűrös and Pozsgai , maybe Miklós Németh, a small team, a smaller company like this.

So it's not the left: glo-ba-lista!

I learned this by going to the Austrians to tell them about this foreign currency credit scam. Seriously, the in-laws just watched. They didn't know it was such a big hog. Then during dinner I say right side, left side.

To this they said, let's leave this right and left. We don't classify it that way (these were people from the Freedom Party there), we are like there are those who work for Austria, and there are these s..households who work against it. So today's left is perfectly globalist, but that is already absolutely clear. Where do they get their horses, where are they trained? Where they take their friends and children for various scholarships, you just have to look at this. Forget right and left. Instead of right-wing and left-wing thinking, let's consider the interest of the nation, because the left-wing elements are exactly in that. The welfare of the people, the cause of the family. There are informal left-wing values ​​and you should not only be ashamed of them, you should be proud of them. And the government that accepts this is not in the right-wing, but in the national interest. There they are, as the brother-in-law said, the s...house brigade. So, I think it is necessary to say this anyway.

imre boros civil academy dombóvár

Civilek.info

Let's turn back to the euro.

If a currency is managed, put into circulation, withdrawn in the country in question, it is part of national sovereignty, because the Hungarian national bank is institutionally responsible for the forint, and the Hungarian national bank is the property of the state. It is part of Hungarian sovereignty. If it is a question of euros, they will issue them somewhere else and, as the case may be, they will tell us whether or not we will receive them, or how much they will receive.

Now, they obviously feel this immeasurable partiality, which can now be experienced here, there and there in Europe. Even the Poles don't deserve to get the money they deserve. However, if some people are doing their best in this Ukrainian war, the Poles are going full throttle in its cause. Nevertheless, it is not enough to - if I want to use a Pest word - not to attract them.

So yes, money is a matter of national sovereignty, if we give it out of our hands, a piece of our national sovereignty will be taken away.

It is as if the Matthias Church were packed up by American billionaires, taken apart piece by piece and set up somewhere in New York City.

You can even decide the economy of a country, see Greece. Of course, it is also possible to decide that there is national money. There are, of course, several techniques for this, but if the management of money, its interest rate, exchange rate, its movement and protection are not in domestic hands, then it is not difficult to see that it is much easier to mess with someone than this way. Because it can be. I didn't say it couldn't be. Of course, the HUF can be drilled, attacked, sorted and so on, but at least then I have a weapon in my hand. In the other case, however, I stand unarmed and just watch. what's up again?

They can, for example, close our account. What did that little (....) Trudeau ? He blocked their accounts so they couldn't fill up with gas. Then what?

Then there's the other story, that you don't need cash. Oh, that's too bad, cash. Oh, you don't have to. I am not saying that cash flow should not be restricted. Yes, it is necessary, because I don't want gangsters walking around with 10 and 100 million forints here and there. So it can be said that certain transactions are required to be handled by account, but to exclude cash from the payment circulation is a restriction of basic human freedom.

imre boros civil academy dombóvar 202305

Civilek.info

Imagine the situation that XYZ is in a situation where, let's say, the authorities don't like its image. They just tell the bank, they block the account. He can't pay the rent, electricity, gas, food or gas, etc. So there is no need for a cashless society, in fact, I would support that this be put into the constitution, because the Basic Law can only be changed with a two-thirds vote. Otherwise, there may be a danger that some people will make people believe that it is good. Now this Libsi duma is going very well, and stories about a cashless society are slowly becoming like drugs, it is easy to get uninformed citizens used to them.

Author and photos: civilek.info