Our future is not a head or a letter  

Our Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó's patriotism, outstanding education, and knowledge of English were impressive when he cornered the BBC reporter who was asking cunning and deceitful questions! - writes László Csizmadia in his opinion article published in Magyar Hírlap.

When we discuss the future of Europe, let's not forget that the citizens of the continent not only have the opportunity, but also the duty to decide their own destiny. Subsidiarity is a factor without which the concept and practice of democracy is unthinkable.

People are unavoidable and always take priority. The diversity of Europe's nations and the preservation of their traditions is Christian civilization itself. The joint decisions of nations determine the benefits provided by the European Union. The preserved independence and autonomy of the member states means constant control over those entrusted with the EU's community work.

We know that the night watchmen cannot be unsupervised either. EU measures require the consent of all member states. This is not an easy thing, but it is profitable in the long run, both economically and politically.

The lack of coordination between EU citizens and EU institutions visibly deepens the gap. The reasons can be clearly perceived, because the right of the people is being violated more and more often. The Brussels elite is advocating measures for which the basic agreement does not allow.

A regular political battle unfolded between the Council of Europe, the European Commission and the European Parliament. The essence is obtaining the possibility of deviation from the basic contract and preserving the originality.

The European Parliament is attacking the legal guarantee of the rule of law of equal states defined in the Basic Treaty. A fundamental corner point of the EU's institutional system may be dismantled if the obligation of unanimous decisions of the legitimate heads of state and prime ministers of the 27 member states becomes withdrawn.

During the parliamentary elections of the member countries, a party/party alliance representing a different ideological primacy wins the opportunity to govern, thereby gaining the trust of the electorate.

At the same time, the various, strengthening or weakening party ideological aspects add up in the European Parliament to the possibility of pushing equality aside and of ideological representation that may be counter-interested to local democracy.

We can see this in the efforts of today's European Parliament, when it tries to turn the hierarchy of the institutional system upside down and thus its original purpose. Great power ambitions prevail in parallel, so it is urgent to clarify the guarantees of maintaining equality.

If the primacy of the ET ceases, including the right of veto of individual countries, equality ends. Political and financial lobbies take over and become independent of the democratic will of the people of the states. The stakes are huge. It determines the fate of citizens living in the present and in the future. The question is whether we will become members of a modern empire that can be pulled by strings, or whether we can work along the common interests of the entire European Union community while maintaining the fundamental independence and rule of law of our nations.

The social liberal forces currently in the majority in the European Union have intertwined with the so-called people's party, which embraces the ideals of an open society. They blow a stone. They aspire to create a United States of Europe. This is directed against the indigenous population, because if the ideology of an open society wins, and if the attack of illegal invaders does not stop, parallel societies will emerge. They end European civilization with the terror of violent proselytes. Our descendants will not have to kneel before the new forces as a gesture, but out of necessity.

The future of Europe is still in our hands. We can announce that there is a kind of democracy, and that it works based on the principle of popular sovereignty and reflects free will.

The time of Western states as colonizers from a position of power is over. Their people must know that their country is being colonized by the financial power which, combined with the guise of an open society, tries to lead them on a leash with the promise of freedom instead of freedom. This mainstream operates with fake cards. He denies the institution of referendums on illegal immigration, gender theory, and other human destiny issues. Europe has repeatedly had trouble with Bolshevik, Nazi and fascist imperial aspirations. The consequences of the Soviet empire's total dictatorship over the peoples of East-Central Europe should be taught as a historical lesson.

So what is to be done - not in the Leninist sense?

In addition to maintaining the rule of law and the rules of democracy, the will of the majority of the electorate should be enforced with the power of free parliamentary elections.

To shine a spotlight on the achievements of working and intellectual citizens working for the country.

To put the treasonous manifestations of power-hungry, subsistence politicians under the microscope. A good example of the latter is the comparison of the habitus of the mayor and the minister of foreign affairs, in response to their statements related to homeland and child protection activities.

According to Karácsony, the referendum is "depopulation". The fact that he fulfilled Gyurcsány's instructions without convening the general assembly during the pandemic is of course not.

The fact that he promised grass and trees before his election - we got a bee pasture, and he fulfilled just over 20% of that in proportion to time - is also forgivable, according to him. The traffic chaos in Budapest is a true "Mecca masterpiece". Its bicycle paths criss-cross the city. We will not forget the reports from Brussels either.

On the other hand, our Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó's patriotism, outstanding education, and English skills were impressive when he cornered the BBC reporter who was asking cunning and deceitful questions. We are not mistaken that he can be a role model for young Hungarians. The result of the interview is proven by the fact that the BBC removed its availability. This is how a citizen who has gained a status thanks to the people, who has won the people's trust, but knows that it must be kept, has to work somehow.

One of our intellectual patriots writes: "we have to scrape out the chestnuts". No one can expect others to do this for us. "If the frog is put in a pot and the water is slowly heated, the frog does not jump out of it, but slowly boils." We Hungarians will not be frogs. We take the national consultation seriously, we make the peace march between nations, we must all be there at the referendum at the Prime Minister's invitation!

Source: magyarhirlap.hu

Featured image: 2022plus

 

(The author is the chairman of CÖKA's board of trustees)