I'm sick of this world. I guess others feel the same way, because meanness, stupidity, and malice flood society to an unprecedented extent, a part of which has already been successfully "integrated" into the team of drooling idiots by the non-existent background power.

These ... I almost wrote that they were people, but I realized it in time, so these creatures, imbued with unjustified hatred, driven by the frustration of their own insignificance, drag everything and everyone who stands out from the average down with them into the dirt with blissful joy. They are not bothered by the facts, they are not interested in the truth, the reality, only to satisfy their desire to defile everyone who is pure and destroy everything that is noble.

The internet has given the creatures an excellent weapon, where they can spread lies without batting an eye, wipe their dirty boots on anyone, and what's more, they don't even have to show themselves. But

one can look at them more like unfortunate, unsuccessful scumbags who, despite their nothingness, can at least feel like someone on the internet. In simpler terms: these should not be attacked, but rather regretted.

The position of the girl is different when I think of the so-called journalists who shamefully mock my own profession. Of course, meanness is not generally characteristic of us, but there is a significant camp of scoundrels who can do anything for money. I used to think that the job of the press was to find out the truth, to reveal and present the reality, to act against lies, and so on. I assumed - naively - that the journalist was a modern-day crusader. A freak!

What kind of scribbler is he who yesterday cited "scientific facts" against delusions, and today he is promoting the false, anti-scientific ideas of, say, the LGBTQ? What kind of unscrupulous scoundrel is he who, with his writings, supports and even welcomes the decision of the idiots of the European Parliament that men can also give birth, even though those who are able to give birth are women even if they declare themselves to be ethical? What kind of penman is he who yesterday defended children's rights with thousands (there is no question of a parent slapping a misbehaving child's bottom, or a teacher putting an uncontrollable kid in the corner, because that is abuse and humiliating), and today he writes in writing to feel sorry for pedophiles , calls for the legalization of pedophilia? In their eyes, what made the protected child a natural sexual toy overnight? Can a scoundrel who excuses murderers, saying that he is poor (no, he's not an illegal immigrant, just a person with mental disorders), can't help it, comes from a different "cultural circle" be called a journalist?

I am reading an article in the British trash newspaper Daily Mail, in which they prove (with the opinion of interviewed "celebrities" "supported") that single women without children are happier than married women with children. Because then crying babies won't interfere with their career development, changing diapers won't hinder their travels. Of course, the interviewees are without exception young or at most middle-aged.

I wonder why they didn't ask those single childless people who are over 60 years old? Those who are as alone as my finger (although there are four more on either hand or foot in addition to one finger) and who now only regret that they sacrificed the family, gave up the child in exchange for career and travel. No matter how many partners they had, they lived and died lonely.

Are career and travel really the measure of happiness? Dirty, vile lie! It is enough to think only of those ladies who raise several children while being leaders, politicians, successful entrepreneurs. Didn't they "make" a career? Or do they not travel enough? (Presumably much more than single childless people, even more than they would like.) This is also a small manifestation of the insidious effort to destroy the traditional family model, to paint egoism as desirable, because - if you like it, if no - this is in the interest of a non-existent background power. The exploitation of the mass of individual unfortunates, the "creation" of simple consumers instead of people.

These facts, and where are we from the end of the society-destroying manifestations of unscrupulous pen-twirlers? Here is Christianity, for example. They have long since gone beyond calling religion simply outdated, medieval, and backward. If a pedophile priest is found, the whole church is immediately a pedophile. (It's interesting that they pity and support the "average pedophile"!), these scribblers approve of a politician who publishes a biblical quote being cited to court for preaching the message of the Scriptures, they demand that the person who prays silently in front of the abortion clinic be punished, the person who preaches on the street and the almost crucifixion of the priest who proclaims the scientific fact (there are only two genders, male and female) with his words.

Of course, these crimes are not only the responsibility of the press workers, but they, on the other hand, harass the plebs, which means that their actions are undeniably effective. And it's also extremely harmful.

The sins of the so-called press could be listed endlessly, but why? This keeps unprincipled villains still villains. And they make my stomach turn several times a day. But in the meantime, Sándor Márai :

"Does it surprise me, because vileness springs from a man like poison from a toad? But just think, what kind of man is this? How distorted, how weak, how only hate and envy is his power? Wipe off the secretions that splattered on your face, don't step on the toad, because you will stain your shoes with blood and pus."

Author: Jr. György Tóth

(Header image: ipu.org )